Edward Bartolo writes:
> To: Steve Litt
>
> I was angry because my apology was not accepted. Thanks for replying
> in a respectful way.
I probably shouldn't be writing this but "you do realize that referring
to other people as 'monsters' isn't exactly a good way to make them
respect you, do you?"
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 02:34:52PM +0100, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> I was of the impression, that to modify the kernel, a PhD was a must.
Where did you get such an impression? The only things you need to
modify the kernel are the ability to program in c, a sufficient
understanding of kernel internal
To: Steve Litt
I was angry because my apology was not accepted. Thanks for replying
in a respectful way.
Edward
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 01:23:30PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 16:00:27 +0200
> Didier Kryn wrote:
>
> > Devuan is not opposed to kdbus, nor even to systemd. People here
> > want the freedom to not use systemd; they don't deny others the right
> > to use it, nor to use kd
On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 16:00:27 +0200
Didier Kryn wrote:
> Devuan is not opposed to kdbus, nor even to systemd. People here
> want the freedom to not use systemd; they don't deny others the right
> to use it, nor to use kdbus.
Devuan was created out of a dislike of systemd. When you say "Peop
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 11:27:52AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
[cut]
>
> Interesting! You are right! I misread a comma as a semicolon.
>
> I never thought of using commas this way. Now I get to wonder whether
> this way of eliminating brackets is clarifying or misleading. It
> misled me.
Quote: "JFTR: I was adressing the person who wrote the original mail (to come up
with something with more substance)."
I begged you pardon.
What are you, a monster without feelings?! At least, be decent to
accept my apology.
Edward.
On 03/08/2015, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 03:32:30PM +0100, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> Hendrik Boom writes:
> > On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 01:14:16PM +0100, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> [*] In case you want an example where this is at least debatable (and I
> >> happen to disgree with what he wrote on the t
Didier Kryn writes:
> Le 03/08/2015 14:14, Rainer Weikusat a écrit :
>> So, if you're (addressed to anyone) opposed to kdbus then please find a
>> better reason then "someone whom I'm a fan of once said ...".
>
> My point was: "The person who will decide to merge kdbus into the
> kernel or not
Hendrik Boom writes:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 01:14:16PM +0100, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
>
>>
>> [*] In case you want an example where this is at least debatable (and I
>> happen to disgree with what he wrote on the topic). The simplest way
>> to implement a block memory copy in C is
>
> C
Le 03/08/2015 14:14, Rainer Weikusat a écrit :
So, if you're (addressed to anyone) opposed to kdbus then please find a
better reason then "someone whom I'm a fan of once said ...".
My point was: "The person who will decide to merge kdbus into the
kernel or not is Linus Torwalds; therefore
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 09:41:32AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 01:14:16PM +0100, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
>
> >
> > [*] In case you want an example where this is at least debatable (and I
> > happen to disgree with what he wrote on the topic). The simplest way
> > t
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 01:14:16PM +0100, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
>
> [*] In case you want an example where this is at least debatable (and I
> happen to disgree with what he wrote on the topic). The simplest way
> to implement a block memory copy in C is
Correction:
>
> static void
I was of the impression, that to modify the kernel, a PhD was a must.
I cannot be blamed for this impression, as I am an EU citizen, which
has been agressively pushing for more qualifications of its work
force. The extent of this drive, is that anybody who holds no
qualificatios, is paid a misery c
Didier Kryn writes:
> Le 03/08/2015 12:03, Rainer Weikusat a écrit :
>> Edward Bartolo writes:
>>> I would like someone from Devuan to reply how Devuan DDs are going to
>>> rid the Linux kernel when kdbus becomes integrated in it. I am finding
>>> this latest news a heavy blow below the belt, as
Le 03/08/2015 12:03, Rainer Weikusat a écrit :
Edward Bartolo writes:
I would like someone from Devuan to reply how Devuan DDs are going to
rid the Linux kernel when kdbus becomes integrated in it. I am finding
this latest news a heavy blow below the belt, as the kernel is usually
reserved for
Edward Bartolo writes:
> I would like someone from Devuan to reply how Devuan DDs are going to
> rid the Linux kernel when kdbus becomes integrated in it. I am finding
> this latest news a heavy blow below the belt, as the kernel is usually
> reserved for highly qualified and highly skilled coders
17 matches
Mail list logo
