[DNG] [Dng] vdev status update: device properties and udev compatibility

2015-06-24 Thread Jude Nelson
Hey everyone, After a longer-than-expected development cycle, I have the latest news for vdev. The TL;DR is that vdev has gained enough infrastructure to generate the information that normally gets put in /run/udev. This is important for most libudev clients, because this information gets used t

Re: [DNG] We Must be Prepared ....

2015-06-24 Thread Daniel Reurich
On 24/06/15 21:33, KatolaZ wrote: On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 09:20:37PM -0400, Jude Nelson wrote: Looks like Linus weighed in. I found the whole conversation thread interesting. http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1506.2/05492.html Yes, it is definitely interesting. The most scary thing

Re: [DNG] We Must be Prepared ....

2015-06-24 Thread Marlon Nunes
On 2015-06-23 22:20, Jude Nelson wrote: Looks like Linus weighed in. I found the whole conversation thread interesting. http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1506.2/05492.html [3] -Jude "We don't merge kernel code just because user space was written by a retarded monkey on crack." "Ker

Re: [DNG] We Must be Prepared ....

2015-06-24 Thread KatolaZ
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 09:20:37PM -0400, Jude Nelson wrote: > Looks like Linus weighed in. I found the whole conversation thread > interesting. > > http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1506.2/05492.html > Yes, it is definitely interesting. The most scary thing is the emergence in that thr

Re: [DNG] We Must be Prepared ....

2015-06-24 Thread Didier Kryn
Le 24/06/2015 03:20, Jude Nelson a écrit : Looks like Linus weighed in. I found the whole conversation thread interesting. http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1506.2/05492.html -Jude Thanks for this enjoyable link, Jude! Looks like the destination of the message is GKH : "I t

Re: [DNG] Packages aren't the only path to alternate inits

2015-06-24 Thread Daniel Reurich
On 22/06/15 23:58, Daniel Reurich wrote: On 20/06/15 05:14, Hendrik Boom wrote: On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 09:29:36PM +1200, Daniel Reurich wrote: I expect the dependency chain should be something like: depends on: init, -sysv-init | -epoch-init | -systemd-init | -openrc-init | -upstart-init A