Hi Jaromil,
Thank you for clarifying. I'm sorry if I'm asking questions too early ;)
I'll give it another try when you feel like the SDK is ready.
I like this workflow a lot, especially the ability to build ISOs (and
presumably other bootable media). I look forward to using it to do
integratio
# [Devuan Weekly News][current] Issue XI
__Volume 02, Week 6, Devuan Week 11__
https://git.devuan.org/Envite/devuan-weekly-news/wikis/past-issues/volume-02/issue-011
## Editorial
From Devuan Weekly News we want to mourn the end of CrunchBang Linux.
Talking about something else, it seems that t
On 2015-02-10 19:52, Wim wrote:
>Hi,
>
>
>Mark inquired about the source of my info on kali. I just saw kali on the
>list at:
>
>http://without-systemd.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page#Operating_systems_without_systemd_in_the_default_installation
>
>Decided to do some research. Apparently, systemd is a
that's not cross compiling, that's compiling on an emulator. cross
compilers directly generate code for the target platform.
"A cross compiler is a compiler capable of creating executable code
for a platform other than the one on which the compiler is running.
For example, a compiler that runs on
Hi,
Mark inquired about the source of my info on kali. I just saw kali on the
list at:
http://without-systemd.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page#Operating_systems_without_systemd_in_the_default_installation
Decided to do some research. Apparently, systemd is already present in the
latest kali 1.0.9:
Il 10/02/2015 10:30 Gravis ha scritto:
to my knowledge, cross compilation has minimal overhead. while having
native targets is good for testing, it won't have a significant impact
on compile time.
agreed,
to my experience, cross compilation using qemu-arm-static in an
armhf chroot inside an am
Hi Robert and list,
I've been reading this list since the beginning. Felt the need to reply to
this, but it's only a "Me too!".
The Raspberry foundation has stated already that they will adopt Jessie
as-is, with systemd. Discussion of systemd on the forum is frowned upon.
Most threads got closed
> It doesn't work on a majority of packages, as I understand (build scripts
> that rely on running compiled code, that don't respect CC, and many other
> causes.)
oh that's dreadful. sounds like something that should be fixed and
submitted upstream.
--Gravis
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Is
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 04:30:30AM -0500, Gravis wrote:
> to my knowledge, cross compilation has minimal overhead. while having
> native targets is good for testing, it won't have a significant impact
> on compile time.
It doesn't work on a majority of packages, as I understand (build scripts
tha
Thanks very much Gravis, Jaromil. I'll let the folk on #xroutine know.
(And about Dowse -- looks interesting too).
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
banana pi uses the ARMv7 architecture which is the same architecture
that raspberry pi 2 uses. you should be able to use the same
software, as long as you have a working bootloader. however, you may
have to recompile the kernel to include the drivers you need.
--Gravis
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at
> Will Rasvuan be backward compatible with the Raspberry A ?
a) it's "Devuan" regardless if it's on a PC, a Mac or on a watch.
b) Raspberry Pi uses the ARMv6 architecture while Raspberry Pi 2 uses
ARMv7 architecture. what you are asking is effectively if something
built for an i486 cpu will run o
hi David,
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015, David Harrison wrote:
> Will this be compatible with the banana pi too? I'm very impressed
> with mine since installing a SATA drive. Makes for a great mini
> server. The current default distro, bananian, is a little flakey.
> Some fellow users were excited at the
Will this be compatible with the banana pi too? I'm very impressed with
mine since installing a SATA drive. Makes for a great mini server. The
current default distro, bananian, is a little flakey. Some fellow users
were excited at the notion of Devuan for their systems too. It's based
on the Al
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 03:30:29 -0500
Gravis wrote:
> i'm actually getting a couple of Pi 2 boards to use as thin clients.
> be assured, ARMv7 packages will be made.
Will Rasvuan be backward compatible with the Raspberry A ?
Cheers,
Ron.
--
Somewhere, just out of sight,
to my knowledge, cross compilation has minimal overhead. while having
native targets is good for testing, it won't have a significant impact
on compile time.
--Gravis
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 4:22 AM, Jaromil wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015, Gravis wrote:
>> be assured, ARMv7 packages will be made
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015, Gravis wrote:
> be assured, ARMv7 packages will be made.
I can't resist but spoiling the news that Nextime has bought two rather
big ARM machines to compile our packages natively on those :^) being put
in rackspaces as we speak. Hack on!
--
Jaromil, Dyne.org Free Software Fo
hi,
On Mon, 09 Feb 2015, Jude Nelson wrote:
>To clarify, the SDK will pull a package from Debian, and create a new
>branch for each version so maintainers can observe and deal with the
>changes?
yes.
>If so, then the maintainers (not Jenkins) will be pulling from
>Debian or
hi Robert,
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015, Robert Storey wrote:
>I just saw this announcement: Raspberry Pi 2 Now on Sale for US$35
>[1]http://www.raspberrypi.org/raspberry-pi-2-on-sale/
>
>Anyway, it's got an ARM7 processor, so at last there is a Pi that
>is fast enough to use as a real co
> It will probably be a few months before I can buy one in my part of the world
> (Taiwan)
now that is irony.
i'm actually getting a couple of Pi 2 boards to use as thin clients.
be assured, ARMv7 packages will be made.
--Gravis
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 3:18 AM, Robert Storey wrote:
> I just s
I just saw this announcement:
Raspberry Pi 2 Now on Sale for US$35
http://www.raspberrypi.org/raspberry-pi-2-on-sale/
It will probably be a few months before I can buy one in my part of the
world (Taiwan), but it's on my shopping list. Maybe for my birthday (in
May).
Anyway, it's got an ARM7 pro
21 matches
Mail list logo
