Re: [Dng] What's new in Systemd

2015-02-07 Thread Klaus Hartnegg
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 12:31:54 -0500 Steve Litt wrote: > I'm not a Star Trek guy. What is the exact meaning of the two > "Resistance is Futile" slides? What point is the presentation trying > to get across? Whoever put this presentation together couldn't have used a worse analogy, because it induce

Re: [Dng] Package Versions

2015-02-07 Thread Jaromil
dear tilt, On Wed, 04 Feb 2015, tilt wrote: > Am 28.01.2015 um 00:19 schrieb tilt: > > [...] > > Right now I practise "+devuanX" re-versioning, so if I > > encounter a hypothetical incoming package with name "xyz" > > and version (in Jessie) "1.2.3-4" then my modified package > > will still be

Re: [Dng] Crunchbag Linux calls it quits

2015-02-07 Thread Richard
Thanks for the news and your efforts. We are waiting as patiently as possible. :) Probably many Debian derivatives are anxiously awaiting, as well. On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Jaromil wrote: > On Fri, 06 Feb 2015, Nate Bargmann wrote: > > > http://crunchbang.org/forums/viewtopic.php?id=3

Re: [Dng] Crunchbag Linux calls it quits

2015-02-07 Thread Jaromil
On Fri, 06 Feb 2015, Nate Bargmann wrote: > http://crunchbang.org/forums/viewtopic.php?id=38916 > > While I knew of its existence, I never tried Crunchbag, so I cannot > comment on its features or user experience. It is a big shame. Crunchbang is a gread distro, I've used it and know many people

Re: [Dng] Crunchbag Linux calls it quits

2015-02-07 Thread emninger
Am Sat, 07 Feb 2015 12:00:02 + schrieb dng-requ...@lists.dyne.org: > I am a crunchbanger, and my sense is that the community was fine with > systemd, that it intended to roll right on in to Jesse without asking > any questions. The thinking was "Crunchbang is based on Debian, and > so it will