Variable bi_sector is not effectively used, so delete it.
drivers/md/dm-integrity.c:1738:13: warning: variable 'bi_sector' set but not
used.
Reported-by: Abaci Robot
Link: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=3895
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong
---
drivers/md/dm-integrity.c | 7 --
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 02:57:24PM -0800, Fan Wu wrote:
> From: Deven Bowers
>
> block_device structures can have valuable security properties,
> based on how they are created, and what subsystem manages them.
That's a lot of cloudy talk but no real explanation.
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-deve
On 1/26/23 02:06, Mike Snitzer wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25 2023 at 7:37P -0500,
Nikos Tsironis wrote:
On 1/23/23 19:34, Mike Snitzer wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19 2023 at 4:36P -0500,
Nikos Tsironis wrote:
On 1/18/23 18:28, Mike Snitzer wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18 2023 at 7:29P -0500,
Nikos Tsironis wrot
Avoid returning uninitialized value in case
lookup fails.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Melin
---
drivers/md/dm-table.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-table.c b/drivers/md/dm-table.c
index 8fc44c9f746a..71c59455bf3b 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-table.c
+++
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master)
by Paolo Abeni :
On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 15:10:44 -0800 you wrote:
> Maintainers of specific kernel subsystems are only Cc-ed on their
> respective patches, not the entire series. [if all goes well]
>
> These patches are based on linux-ne
On Tue, 2023-01-31 at 12:10 +, patchwork-bot+netdev...@kernel.org
wrote:
> Hello:
>
> This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master)
> by Paolo Abeni :
>
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 15:10:44 -0800 you wrote:
> > Maintainers of specific kernel subsystems are only Cc-ed on their
> > respectiv
Since we have a function to set the action to reload, use it.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski
---
libmultipath/configure.c | 8 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libmultipath/configure.c b/libmultipath/configure.c
index e689f8a7..050b984a 100644
--- a/libmu
The ACT_RESIZE action is the same as the ACT_RELOAD action, except that
it flushes outstanding IO because the device size is changing and
the new size might be too small for some of the outstanding IO. If we've
detected a size change, and a forced reload is requested, we still need
to flush the IO
If select_action() is called and a multipath device needs to be renamed,
the code currently checks if force_reload is set, and if so, does the
reload after the rename. But if force_reload isn't set, only the rename
happens, regardless of what other actions are needed. This can happen if
multipathd
If a multipath device needs to be renamed and reloaded when multipathd
starts, it will only get reloaded. This can happen if the multipath
configuration is different between the initramfs and regular filesystem.
The only thing that can happen along with a rename is a force reload.
This patchset ma
Combine the two separate blocks that set ACT_CREATE into one.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski
---
libmultipath/configure.c | 38 +-
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libmultipath/configure.c b/libmultipath/configure.c
index 6811
On Tue, Jan 31 2023 at 6:01P -0500,
Nikos Tsironis wrote:
> On 1/26/23 02:06, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 25 2023 at 7:37P -0500,
> > Nikos Tsironis wrote:
> >
> > > On 1/23/23 19:34, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 19 2023 at 4:36P -0500,
> > > > Nikos Tsironis wrote:
> > >
On Tue, Jan 24 2023 at 6:34P -0500,
Sergei Shtepa wrote:
> DearMike
>
> I am very glad that you noticed my patch version 2.
> I'm sure your experience will help.
>
> On 1/17/23 22:04, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > Subject:
> > Re: [PATCH v2 00/21] blksnap - block devices snapshots module
> > From:
>
On Fri, Dec 09 2022 at 9:23P -0500,
Sergei Shtepa wrote:
> Allows to attach block device filters to the block devices. Kernel
> modules can use this functionality to extend the capabilities of the
> block layer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtepa
> ---
> block/bdev.c | 70 +
14 matches
Mail list logo