On Thu, 2023-06-01 at 12:51 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 03:30:02PM +, Martin Wilck wrote:
> > On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 18:02 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski
> >
> > I wonder if it might make sense for group_by_tpg to mock ca
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 03:30:02PM +, Martin Wilck wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 18:02 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski
>
> I wonder if it might make sense for group_by_tpg to mock calls to
> getprio (assigning the prio from the path's TPG ID) rather tha
On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 18:02 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski
I wonder if it might make sense for group_by_tpg to mock calls to
getprio (assigning the prio from the path's TPG ID) rather than calling
set_priority() directly.
> ---
> tests/pgpolicy.c | 201
> +
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski
---
tests/pgpolicy.c | 201 +++
1 file changed, 201 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/pgpolicy.c b/tests/pgpolicy.c
index 43be831f..85fa30ce 100644
--- a/tests/pgpolicy.c
+++ b/tests/pgpolicy.c
@@ -32,6 +32,15 @@ struct
