Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] multipath-tools build: accept KBUILD_BUILD_TIMESTAMP from env

2023-07-09 Thread Chris Lamb
Martin Wilck wrote: > Can we do this instead? It looks slightly more readable to me. LGTM. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org 🍥 chris-lamb.co.uk `- -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listin

Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] multipath-tools build: accept KBUILD_BUILD_TIMESTAMP from env

2023-06-26 Thread Martin Wilck
On Tue, 2023-06-06 at 19:12 +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > From: Chris Lamb > > It would appear KBUILD_BUILD_TIMESTAMP is meant to be used the same > way as in > the linux kernel build. For linux, builders are supposed to set > KBUILD_BUILD_TIMESTAMP in the environment if they want a stable >

[dm-devel] [PATCH] multipath-tools build: accept KBUILD_BUILD_TIMESTAMP from env

2023-06-06 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
From: Chris Lamb It would appear KBUILD_BUILD_TIMESTAMP is meant to be used the same way as in the linux kernel build. For linux, builders are supposed to set KBUILD_BUILD_TIMESTAMP in the environment if they want a stable timestamp. The libddmmp makefile however tries to directly call git to ge