On 14.12.21 11:03, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
On 12/14/21 5:31 PM, Donald Buczek wrote:
-void md_reap_sync_thread(struct mddev *mddev)
+void md_reap_sync_thread(struct mddev *mddev, bool reconfig_mutex_held)
{
struct md_rdev *rdev;
sector_t old_dev_sectors = mddev->dev_sectors;
On 14.12.21 03:34, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
On 12/10/21 10:16 PM, Donald Buczek wrote:
Dear Guoqing,
On 13.02.21 01:49, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
Unregister sync_thread doesn't need to hold reconfig_mutex since it
doesn't reconfigure array.
And it could cause deadlock problem for raid5 as follows:
On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 08:25:00AM +, Martin Wilck wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-11-18 at 16:47 -0600, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> > +int
> > +sysfs_get_ro (struct path *pp)
> > +{
> > + int ro;
> > + char buff[3]; /* Either "0\n\0" or "1\n\0" */
> > +
> > + if (!pp->udev)
> > +
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 01:06:45PM +0100, Martin Wilck wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 21:28 +0100, Martin Wilck wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 10:52 -0600, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 09:52:49PM +0100, Martin Wilck wrote:
> > > > I agree. Also, I realize that we've bum
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 12:33 PM Vivek Goyal wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 08:41:30AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 6:23 AM Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 09:23:18AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 06:44:26AM -0
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 08:41:30AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 6:23 AM Vivek Goyal wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 09:23:18AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 06:44:26AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 6:17 AM
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 6:23 AM Vivek Goyal wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 09:23:18AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 06:44:26AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 6:17 AM Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > > Going forward, I am wondering should virtiof
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 09:23:18AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 06:44:26AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 6:17 AM Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > Going forward, I am wondering should virtiofs use flushcache version as
> > > well. What if host filesyste
On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 06:48:05AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 6:05 AM Vivek Goyal wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 07:38:28AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > While using the MC-safe copy routines is rather pointless on a virtual
> > > device
> > > like virtio
On 12/14/21 5:31 PM, Donald Buczek wrote:
-void md_reap_sync_thread(struct mddev *mddev)
+void md_reap_sync_thread(struct mddev *mddev, bool
reconfig_mutex_held)
{
struct md_rdev *rdev;
sector_t old_dev_sectors = mddev->dev_sectors;
bool is_reshaped = false;
/*
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 12:36:40PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> In preparation for FORTIFY_SOURCE performing compile-time and run-time
> field bounds checking for memset(), avoid intentionally writing across
> neighboring fields.
>
> Add struct_group() to mark region of struct journal_sector that sho
11 matches
Mail list logo
