Re: [dm-devel] xts fuzz testing and lack of ciphertext stealing support

2019-07-20 Thread Markus
Thanks for tellimg me as a user :-) ... learned something :-) Am 20.07.19 um 09:35 schrieb Milan Broz: > > If it is visible to users, it needs some work in userspace - XEX (as XTS) > need two keys, > people are already confused enough that 256bit key in AES-XTS means AES-128... > So the examples

Re: [dm-devel] xts fuzz testing and lack of ciphertext stealing support

2019-07-20 Thread Milan Broz
On 20/07/2019 08:58, Eric Biggers wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 01:19:41PM +0200, Milan Broz wrote: >> Also, I would like to avoid another "just because it is nicer" module >> dependence (XTS->XEX->ECB). >> Last time (when XTS was reimplemented using ECB) we have many reports with >> initramfs