Re: [dm-devel] [release] multipath-tools 0.7.7

2018-05-15 Thread Christophe Varoqui
Martin, Xose, Those patches are now merged. Thanks for the notification. On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:10 PM, Martin Wilck wrote: > Hello Christophe, > > Christophe Varoqui wrote on 05/11/18 > 10:57 AM: > > Hi, > > I merged the reviewed patches from March 27th up to now, and released > 0.7.7. > >

Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] libmultipath: fix error parsing "find_multipaths strict"

2018-05-15 Thread Christophe Varoqui
Merged, thanks. On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:32 PM, Martin Wilck wrote: > If "find_multipaths strict" is set in multipath.conf, the error message > "illegal value for find_multipaths: strict" is printed. This causes no > functional problem, as "strict" happens to be the default, fallback > value. I

Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] multipath-tools: configure hitachi ams2000 and hus100 as full active arrays

2018-05-15 Thread Christophe Varoqui
Merged, thanks. On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 5:30 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > AMS2000 and HUS100 families are active/active arrays. > > Based on https://support.hitachivantara.com/download/epcra/df818913.pdf > and internal hitachi docs. > > > Cc: Matthias Rudolph > Cc: Christophe Varoqui > Cc:

[dm-devel] [PATCH] libmultipath: fix error parsing "find_multipaths strict"

2018-05-15 Thread Martin Wilck
If "find_multipaths strict" is set in multipath.conf, the error message "illegal value for find_multipaths: strict" is printed. This causes no functional problem, as "strict" happens to be the default, fallback value. It should be fixed nonetheless. FIND_MULTIPATHS_STRICT, having the highest numeri

Re: [dm-devel] [release] multipath-tools 0.7.7

2018-05-15 Thread Martin Wilck
Hello Christophe, Christophe Varoqui wrote on 05/11/18 10:57 AM: > Hi, > I merged the reviewed patches from March 27th up to now, and released 0.7.7. > Thanks, > Christophe. Two of my patches seem to be missing: - libmultipath: don't reject maps with undefined prio Reviewed by Ben in https

Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v3] kvmalloc: always use vmalloc if CONFIG_DEBUG_SG

2018-05-15 Thread Joonsoo Kim
Hello, Mikulas. On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 02:41:47PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > > On Tue, 24 Apr 2018, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 08:29:14AM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 23 Apr 2018, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 23,

[dm-devel] Incorrect results for device mapper statistics

2018-05-15 Thread Drew Hastings
Referring to this: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/device-mapper/statistics.txt Basically it seems like a discard takes a certain amount of time, and the discard can span multiple statistic areas. Each area then claims it took that total amount of time for the discard, making the accounti

Re: [dm-devel] how to set higher then 128 nr_requests on LV's

2018-05-15 Thread Mike Snitzer
No, if you'd like to keep the device active then there is no existing way to restacking a Dom device's queue_limits.MikeOn May 14, 2018 7:58 PM, Pankaj Agarwal wrote:Hannes,While you are working on the feature code, is there a sequence of system commands I can use ?thanks,PankajOn Mon, May 14, 201

[dm-devel] [PATCH] dm rq: replace BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled) with lockdep's lock annotation

2018-05-15 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
In commit 052189a2ec95 ("dm: remove superfluous irq disablement in dm_request_fn") the spin_lock_irq() was replaced with spin_lock() + a check for disabled interrupts. Later the locking part was removed in commit 2eb6e1e3aa87 ("dm: submit stacked requests in irq enabled context") but the BUG_ON() c

Re: [dm-devel] how to set higher then 128 nr_requests on LV's

2018-05-15 Thread Pankaj Agarwal
Hannes, While you are working on the feature code, is there a sequence of system commands I can use ? thanks, Pankaj On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote: > On Mon, May 14 2018 at 12:13pm -0400, > Mike Snitzer wrote: > > > On Sun, May 13 2018 at 8:47pm -0400, > > Pankaj Aga