On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 2:55 AM Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 11:51:55AM +0800, Jason Xing wrote:
> > Sorry to revive the old thread! I noticed this change because I've
> > been doing an investigation around TSQ recently. I'm very cautious
> > about the change in the core
Hello,
On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 11:51:55AM +0800, Jason Xing wrote:
> Sorry to revive the old thread! I noticed this change because I've
> been doing an investigation around TSQ recently. I'm very cautious
> about the change in the core/sensitive part of the networking area
> because it might affec
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 5:24 PM Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> The only generic interface to execute asynchronously in the BH context is
> tasklet; however, it's marked deprecated and has some design flaws. To
> replace tasklets, BH workqueue support was recently added. A BH workqueue
> behaves similarly to
Hello, Eric. How have you been?
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 09:23:00AM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
...
> TSQ matters for high BDP, and is very time sensitive.
>
> Things like slow TX completions (firing from napi poll, BH context)
> can hurt TSQ.
>
> If we add on top of these slow TX completions, an
On 2024-02-16 01:23, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> !---|
> This Message Is From an External Sender
>
> |---!
>
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 6:31 AM Tejun Heo wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 6:31 AM Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 11:11:53PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > The only generic interface to execute asynchronously in the BH context is
> > tasklet; however, it's marked deprecated and has some design flaws. To
> > replace tasklets,
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 11:11:53PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> The only generic interface to execute asynchronously in the BH context is
> tasklet; however, it's marked deprecated and has some design flaws. To
> replace tasklets, BH workqueue support was recently added. A BH workqueue
> behav
