On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 09:13:57PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> > I'm not sure why this is needed or related, or even what additional
> > distinction is added here.
>
> Because for rq-based device, there are two different stage,
> blk_account_io_start() while allocating new rq, and
> blk_mq_start_reque
Hi,
在 2025/04/21 19:59, Christoph Hellwig 写道:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 09:09:37AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
- remove unused blk_mq_in_flight
That should probably be a separate patch.
ok
- rename blk_mq_in_flight_rw to blk_mq_count_in_driver_rw, to distinguish
from bdev_count_inflight_rw.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 09:09:37AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> - remove unused blk_mq_in_flight
That should probably be a separate patch.
> - rename blk_mq_in_flight_rw to blk_mq_count_in_driver_rw, to distinguish
> from bdev_count_inflight_rw.
I'm not sure why this is needed or related, or even w
From: Yu Kuai
- rename part_in_{flight, flight_rw} and to bdev_count_{inflight,
inflight_rw}.
- export bdev_count_inflight_rw, to fix a problem in mdraid that foreground
IO can be starved by background sync IO in later patches.
- reuse bdev_count_inflight_rw for bdev_count_inflight, also add
