On Mon, 2025-07-14 at 12:59 -0400, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 04:11:46PM +0200, Martin Wilck wrote:
> > On Fri, 2025-07-11 at 14:15 +0200, Martin Wilck wrote:
> >
> >
> > It's getting so awkward that we might as well just use memset.
>
> Yeah. picking a member from one o
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 04:11:46PM +0200, Martin Wilck wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-07-11 at 14:15 +0200, Martin Wilck wrote:
> > On Thu, 2025-07-10 at 14:10 -0400, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> > > When you change the reservation key of a registered multipath
> > > device,
> > > some of paths might be down
On Fri, 2025-07-11 at 14:15 +0200, Martin Wilck wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-07-10 at 14:10 -0400, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> > When you change the reservation key of a registered multipath
> > device,
> > some of paths might be down or even deleted since you originally
>
> [...]
> >
> > Signed-off-by:
On Thu, 2025-07-10 at 14:10 -0400, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> When you change the reservation key of a registered multipath device,
> some of paths might be down or even deleted since you originally
[...]
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski
This is not a full review, just feedback about a fa
When you change the reservation key of a registered multipath device,
some of paths might be down or even deleted since you originally
registered the key. libmpathpersist won't be able to change these
registrations. This can be a problem if the path that is down is holding
the reservation. Other no