Django Json server testing, new to Django

2008-05-20 Thread puff
is an issue with Django's development server that limits it to serving a single view at a time. Can anyone verify this? Thanks for any clues. Puff <<<<< code >>>>> import urllib from django.http import HttpResponse from django.utils import simplejson #

Re: Django Json server testing, new to Django

2008-05-21 Thread puff
Thanks Diego. I'd looked at the tutorial as I got started but that didn't register. It is, of course, the case as when I ran a second development server on a different port and modified the URI appropriately things worked. On May 20, 9:45 pm, Diego Ucha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot

Django in a HA cluster web services application with some near real time elements

2008-05-21 Thread puff
We are considering using Django as part of a HA cluster web services application that has some near real time elements. While much of our application seems well suited to Django some of the near real time elements are concerns and we were hoping that this list might provide some perspective on t

Re: Django in a HA cluster web services application with some near real time elements

2008-05-21 Thread puff
Thanks Graham and Ben for the prompt feedback. It was most helpful. > Depending on the hosting mechanism has been configured, any Django > startup may only happen the first time a request comes in. This would > potentially delay requests if the initialisation takes a while. Our current hosting

Re: Django in a HA cluster web services application with some near real time elements

2008-05-21 Thread puff
Thanks Ben for responding so promptly. > I'm probably not qualified to comment on the deeper technical issues > mentioned here. However that said I've just taken over quite a large > codebase that does some of this stuff, and it can be quite painful! I'd > suggest keeping your django code as simp

TimeField display in Admin interface

2008-05-21 Thread puff
I'm new to Django and noticed that a timefield set to 00:00:00 (midnight in the default choice list) displays as (none) in the admin interface. Is this expected behavior? Is there some way to cause it to display as midnight? I also noticed that a timefield of 00:00:01 DOES display as midnight i

Re: Django in a HA cluster web services application with some near real time elements

2008-05-22 Thread puff
Graham, Thanks very much. That was extremely helpful. Regards, Richard --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To u

Extending User

2008-06-01 Thread puff
I'm relatively new to Django and struggleing a bit trying to extend Django's native User model. What I'd like to achieve is the following: - Add a few fields to the existing User model - Have these fields editable on Django's Admin screen - When a new User is saved, execute a bit of code to tell

Django bug or very strange behavior - new to Django don't know which

2008-06-03 Thread puff
RAW sql statement SELECT COUNT(*) FROM `xx_xxraid` shows table has 12 records. In application statement print '---xxx raids have', ESRaid.objects.count() prints 0! Why? I've imported connections and print connection.queries[-1] just after the count prints {'time': '0.000', 'sql':

Re: Django bug or very strange behavior - new to Django don't know which

2008-06-03 Thread puff
method of xx_xxraid is NOT being invoked. It seems likely that add and delete are overrides associated with the admin interface NOT, sadly, with the DB API. No joy, but at least I know what is going on. On Jun 3, 5:36 pm, puff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > RAW sql statement SELECT COUNT

Re: Django bug or very strange behavior - new to Django don't know which

2008-06-04 Thread puff
The original code used a loop as you illustrated for the delete. Although I no longer have the original code, the annotated traces (see below) show the delete code in xx_xxraid was NOT invoked. This strikes me as at least a deficiency if not a bug. initializexxNode todo: tell SS delete xxno

Odd behavior in admin interface with 404 AFTER record is updated!

2008-06-04 Thread puff
I'm having some difficulty with the admin interface that has me stumped and could use a clue or two. I've a table that looks like this: class Destination(models.Model): name = models.CharField( 'Name', max_length = LENGTH_NAMES_LONG, primary_key = True, help_text = 'Destinati

Re: Odd behavior in admin interface with 404 AFTER record is updated!

2008-06-05 Thread puff
It turns out that Django doesn't like '/' or ':' in the primary key. Not sure why but that's just the way it is. On Jun 4, 6:55 pm, puff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm having some difficulty with the admin interface that has me > stumped and could

Dynamic initialization of MultipleChoiceField

2008-06-09 Thread puff
I needed to create a dynamically initialized MultipleChoiceField. Unfortunately, the Django docs when talking about initialize didn't go into how to deal with MultipleChoiceField. A bit of scratching around didn't show a real solution although Getting dynamic model choices in newforms (http://www

Re: Dynamic initialization of MultipleChoiceField

2008-06-09 Thread puff
t; on form > Then in the method, assign > self.fields['items'].choices = choices > > and when you instantiate a form, you can specify the choices > choices = [('1', '1'), ('2', '2')] > form=RecoverForm(choices) > > -Adi >

Possible documentation/implementation bug for unique_together

2013-10-11 Thread puff
I'm relatively new to Django and used unique_together in 1.5 per the development documentation: unique_together = ("driver", "restaurant") This appears to cause run time errors leading to a transaction abort. However, unique_together = ("driver", "restaurant",) seems to work. Is this a do