Re: Where to put utility functions...

Thanks for the replies! I ended up creating a python package in the site's directory. Abhik On Nov 5, 8:35 am, bruno desthuilliers wrote: > On 5 nov, 16:52, apramanik wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > If I have some utility functions I want to share amongst my apps, > &

Anything like RoR's render :partial?

Hi all, I'm migrating to Django from Ruby on Rails. In the template language for Django, I've been looking for something similar to RoR's render :partial but can't find anything. It allows you write a template for a snippet of code rather than an entire page. I found it very useful when I was disp

Re: Anything like RoR's render :partial?

-15 at 09:26 -0800, apramanik wrote: > > > I'm migrating to Django from Ruby on Rails. In the template language > > for Django, I've been looking for something similar to RoR's > > render :partial but can't find anything. It allows you write a > > temp

Re: Anything like RoR's render :partial?

Awesome! Thanks for the clarification. Abhik On Nov 15, 10:48 am, Dennis Kaarsemaker wrote: > On zo, 2009-11-15 at 10:08 -0800, apramanik wrote: > > > Sure in most cases, but is there a way to fake setting the context of > > the included template? If I'm iterating ove

Form that handles variable number of inputs.

Hi all, How would I get a Form to handle a variable number of inputs (these inputs are added via javascript)? Is this possible in Django? Thanks! Abhik -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django

Have var available in every context passed to a template?

Hi all, Is there a way (either via decorators or some other mechanism) to get an var/object (say request.user) to be in the context passed to every template. The reason I want to do this is my base template uses "user.is_authenticated" in a branch. Thanks Abhik -- You received this message beca

Re: Have var available in every context passed to a template?

Great, that worked! Abhik On Nov 21, 6:52 pm, Christophe Pettus wrote: > On Nov 21, 2009, at 6:48 PM, apramanik wrote: > > > Is there a way (either via decorators or some other mechanism) to get > > an var/object (say request.user) to be in the context passed to every > >

Fixtures don't retain primary keys from 'pk'

Hi all, I've created a few yaml fixtures, but they don't retain the primary key you specify via "pk:". Here's a sample: - model: locations.location pk: 1 fields: type: 2 name: 'USA' aux_data: 'US' latitude: 12 longitude: -10 The primary key seems to always be 2 for every

ForeignKey efficiency question

Hey all, if I have a foreign key on a model (say Model B has a foreign key to Model A) and I do something like this: a = A.objects.get( pk = 1 ) b = B.objects.get( pk = 1 ) if b.a == a : # Do something Is that inefficient, since its doing a join to pull b.a? Should I be comparing their ids?

Re: ForeignKey efficiency question

Oops not a join, but still a db hit :). On Jan 6, 9:03 pm, apramanik wrote: > Hey all, if I have a foreign key on a model (say Model B has a foreign > key to Model A) and I do something like this: > > a = A.objects.get( pk = 1 ) > b = B.objects.get( pk = 1 ) > > if

Re: ForeignKey efficiency question

Thanks! On Jan 7, 2:19 am, Daniel Roseman wrote: > On Jan 7, 5:07 am, apramanik wrote: > > > > > Oops not a join, but still a db hit :). > > > On Jan 6, 9:03 pm, apramanik wrote: > > > > Hey all, if I have a foreign key on a model (say Model B has a

Mysterious transactions wrapping views without middleware.

Hey all, I am seeing transactions wrapping my views without using the 'django.middleware.transaction.TransactionMiddleware'. I don't have any @transaction decorators around my view. I also tried setting DISABLE_TRANSACTION_MANAGEMENT to True as per: http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.1/topics/db/t

Re: Mysterious transactions wrapping views without middleware.

, the transaction is *not* rolled back. If I place "transaction.set_dirty()" before the create, the transaction is rolled back. Seems like a bug. Abhik On Jan 9, 4:57 pm, Karen Tracey wrote: > On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 7:06 PM, apramanik wrote: > > Hey all, > > > I am seei

Re: Mysterious transactions wrapping views without middleware.

/ticket/12565 On Jan 11, 10:20 am, Tomasz Zieliński wrote: > On 10 Sty, 02:38, apramanik wrote: > > > > > Thanks! That partially fixes my problem. I wrapped a function with > > commit_on_success and it doesn't rollback the changes if it throws an > > Int

Postgres and "autocommit"

I turned autocommit on for our Django project and our unittests fail unless we put "transaction.rollback" in our tearDown. Any idea why? After fixing that I also noticed that our unittests are *much* slower. Is it because they're mainly doing deletes and writes (we also load in fixtures via YAML) a

Django won't create foreign keys

Hi all, I'm trying out the Django development version and have been going through the tutorial, but the models aren't creating foreign keys. When I run 'python manage.py sql polls' I get: BEGIN; CREATE TABLE `polls_poll` ( `id` integer AUTO_INCREMENT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, `question` var

Re: Django won't create foreign keys

> wrote: > Do manage.py sqlall polls instead, it will show all the sql, not just > the tables, > > On Jan 12, 3:41 pm, apramanik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > I'm trying out the Django development version and have been going > > throug

Re: Django won't create foreign keys

s.add(model) It didn't make sense to pass in model to sql_for_pending_references. On Jan 12, 2:21 pm, apramanik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well inserting rows with invalid poll_id's works, until i enter the > ALTER TABLE by hand, so the foreign key constraints are definite

Re: Django won't create foreign keys

Anyone? I still haven't gotten this to work without modifying Django. Thanks! On Jan 12, 3:34 pm, apramanik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems to be fixed if I change sql_create django/core/management/ > sql.py to > > for model in app_models: >