I have a use case where I am retroactively adding save(update_fields=...)
to an existing code base. Sometimes the code is structured such that
'self' of the model is modified in other helper methods of the model, but
not saved immediately. It seems like it would be useful to restructure the
Let's say I have:
class Restaurant(Model):
pass
class Table(Model)
restaurant = ForeignKey(Restaurant)
class Chair(Model)
restaurant = ForeignKey(Restaurant)
table = ForeignKey(Table)
Is there a best practice for ensuring that the chair assigned to a table is
always from the same
I'm using Django's (1.11) typical default db for my regular Django
development, but I need to integrate with someone else's bugzilla db server
running on mysql somewhere else (no web api available, mysql is the
recommendation from them). So I've added a 2nd DB to my DB config
pointing to th
On Tuesday, May 29, 2018 at 12:09:46 PM UTC-7, Rich Rauenzahn wrote:
>
>
> Is this possible? How?
>
>
Ah, found this thread which suggests just using sqlite locally... I'll give
it a try:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/django-users/jxkTmibjmX4
--
You received
I'm having a strange problem. My test environment has been working fine,
but I am upgrading my environment's Django revision slowly, which means I
also need to move away from django-nose's FastFixtureTestCase.
I'm now at Django 1.7. I have a TestCase which is more or less...
class Foo(TestC
I've been tracing into django core code, and it looks to me that I have a
case where the fixture has a auth.User(username=rich) with a pk=1 in the
fixture. But sometimes as the User fixture with pk=1 is being added
(updated?) through Model._save_table(), the same User with pk=5 is already
in
On Thursday, May 5, 2016 at 4:22:11 PM UTC-7, Mike Dewhirst wrote:
>
> Are you using setUp() and tearDown() as class methods in your test class?
>
>
No, the code was using setUpClass(), which is a classmethod.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Djan
On Friday, May 6, 2016 at 4:11:42 AM UTC-7, Alasdair Nicol wrote:
>
>
>>
>> But In this particular run I'm currently tracing, rich is already in the
>> db (as the only entry) as pk=5 (via fixture loading process). For one,
>> this tells me the sequence generators aren't always resetting betwe
I'm working on a project that needs to occasionally render very large
tables -- I'm picking hundreds of thousands of cells as a test point for
trying out back end implementation scalability.
I'm parallelizing some of the rendering through ajax calls that returns
large subsets of the rendered c
I wonder if this is a case you want to catch and *not* warn about.
In my case, I'm doing a:
haves =
MyModel.objects.filter(foreign_relationship=4).order_by('foreign_relationship__value',
'common_key')
havenots = MyModel.objects.exclude(id__in=haves).order_by('common_key')
query = haves.union(
Hi,
I'd like to make a mixin to set the placeholder text in the widget attrs.
Reading this https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5793, it seems that
extending Meta for custom fields is somewhat discouraged.
Would the following be the recommended way to do it? Just adding a class
variable to t
This is heads up in case anyone sees something similar:
I have managed to trigger this degenerate query case in two completely
different Django 2.2 projects. In production with a normal sized dataset,
the query time is fine. But during unit testing with a small subset of the
data, the querie
I'm trying to figure out why my migrations appear to run twice when unit
testing.I do have multiple dbs with custom routers to route to
different databases.
I've tried debugging and tracing the routers to see if that's where the
issue lies, but I don't know enough about the migration proce
I've created a CompositeForeignKey constraint derived from Django's new
BaseConstraint. It requires that I manually make a unique_together in any
of the referenced models views due to the DB internal requirements of
composite foreign keys.
It mostly works -- except that when the operations are
14 matches
Mail list logo