Based on what you described as your intent, have you looked at
ModelChoiceField? You could create a new table, e.g. ProductOptions, that
has a foreign key to your Product table. In your form class you can then
pass a queryset into the ModelChoiceField that selects only the options for
that product
unicode gives me nightmares.
Taking django out of the picture for a moment:
>>> unicode('foo', 'utf-8')
u'foo'
>>> unicode(u'foo', 'utf-8')
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
TypeError: decoding Unicode is not supported
So I would assume when you run it inside django you're
LANG
>
> -----
>
> Have you got any clues what may cause the problem?
>
> Thank you for your help.
>
> On Aug 3, 11:31 pm, Alec Shaner wrote:
> > unicode gives me nightmar
ng special with apache. If you put
that in your code and it has UTF-8 in both cases then this issue is beyond
me.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 4:10 PM, sohesado wrote:
>
>
>
> On Aug 4, 6:48 pm, Alec Shaner wrote:
> > I'm no expert on encodings so I can only suggest some alter
The "new" values are what you just set: in your example, self.a=3 and
self.b=4 if you're inside your custom save method. Then you can get the
current values from the database from inside your custom save with something
like:
current = Foo.objects.get(pk=self.pk)
and inspect current.b for special
You can't use a dictionary if you expect a certain order of key/value pairs.
Given model A you could get a list of field objects in the same order (I
think) as defined in the model class
A._meta.fields
At least with that information you could programatically produce a list of
data in matching or
Hopefully some django sql guru will give you a better answer, but I'll take
a stab at it.
What you describe does sound pretty tricky. Is this something that has to be
done in a single query statement? If you just need to build a list of
objects you could do it in steps, e.g.:
# Get all State obje
Regarding your issue with get_next, could be because you're invoking the
method when you define default=get_next(). Try it with just the bare method
name get_next.
You could also use the aggregate function instead of creating a new model:
http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.2/topics/db/aggregation
1. What is your code for doing the filters? If you want to start with
physical drives it would be something like:
RaidPhysicalDrive.objects.filter(in_array__in_storage__in_system__id=)
2. In your template you've referenced pd.in_array_id, but don't you just
want pd.in_array if you're wanting to
You could use a context processor to read the flatpage table to build the
menu. If you want more control over the menu then create a Menu model and
store the flatpage links there and again build the menu in a context
processor. You would probably want to use some level of caching if you don't
want
You could set a context variable, e.g., listing_operation = 'Edit' or
'Create'. Or you could use different templates, each inheriting a common
template and only doing minor tweaks.
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:04 AM, reduxdj wrote:
> I have some decisions i need to make in my template based on the
Rolando's suggestion is a pretty straight forward method to achieve what you
want. You probably need to elaborate where in the process you're having
trouble (although based on your response maybe it's the first step?). You
can indeed call a view.my function from your please wait template, but you
w
$.getJSON should be embedded in your initial Page Wait response page. The
first argument isn't a view, rather a URL. So you might want to use the
django url template tag, e.g.,
$.getJSON('{% url whatever.run_DHM %}', ...)
The second argument is a callback function. The browser stores the callback
Perhaps see:
http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.2/topics/forms/formsets/
where it talks about the "extra" keyword that controls how many blank forms
to add, the default is 1
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:31 PM, ses1984 wrote:
> Basically I have a queryset with N items in it, which I use to create
ML page as
> an example or a live example on the web. I am sorry for the trouble
> but I'd like to understand this and get it working.
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Alec Shaner
> wrote:
> > $.getJSON should be embedded in your initial Page Wait response page.
Could you post the full url.py file?
And as Brian mentioned your javascript block should be separated. Plus you
have an extra }); that's going to fail once you resolve this reverse error.
It's also not clear what you intend to happen when run_DHM returns its
response? It looks like your intent is
>(r'^rotamer_diff/$', rotamer_dif_frame),
>(r'^side-by-side/$', side_by_side),
>(r'^side-by-side-key/$', side_by_side_key),
>(r'^side-by-side-frame/$', side_by_side_frame),
> (r'^DHM_run/$', run_DHM),
>(r&#x
t results from session
>return render_to_response('ran_DHM.html', ...)
>
> '# Get results from session' Would I not just do this:
>
> def display_DHM(request):
>return render_to_response('DHM_ran.html', request.session, ...)
>
> Or do I have
} else {
> alert(data);
>}
>}
>});
>
>
> an of course configure url.py and view.py as explained previously. Is
> there an easy way to do this? In other words, what are the
> If_come_from_pageA and If_come_from_pageB conditions? Can
Excellent. Glad you got it working.
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Bradley Hintze wrote:
> I got to work! I needed a good nights sleep to see it. the url was
> '/DHM_run/' NOT '/run_DHM/'.
>
> Thanks Alec
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Djan
Maybe this is what you want:
http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.2/topics/db/aggregation/#filtering-on-annotations
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Phlip wrote:
> Djangoids:
>
> Consider this QuerySet:
>
> Blog.objects.filter(comment__date__range=(self.yesterday,
> self.tomorrow))
>
> It retur
Try this:
I'm assuming you define Article.category as a ManyToMany field? I also
assumed for the example that Category has a name field.
# Build a queryset of all categories not in desired set, e.g., 'Exact1' and
'Exact2'
bad_categories = Category.objects.exclude(category_name__in=['Exact1',
'Exa
As to whether it's a bug or not I have no idea, though it seems so.
If you use:
entity = models.OneToOneField(Entity, parent_link=True, primary_key=True)
it will create the primary key in both Kid and Adult tables, which
sounds like what you want?
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 1:06 PM, phill wro
Also, if you're using mod_wsgi (recommended over mod_python), see this:
http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/wiki/IntegrationWithDjango
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Addy Yeow wrote:
> runserver takes care of thing like this for you but you need to handle
> it properly in Apache.
> See
> http:
Definitely sounds like a regular expression is what you need.
Not sure what you mean by etcare you saying any variation of a web
address for mysite.com, i.e., with or without www prefix, with our
without protocol http://, and with our without the index page, which
itself could be any variation
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 3:45 AM, Sheena wrote:
> I also want to have the option to add any attachment. So I want to
> have a button that when pressed allows the user to pick a file on
> their hdd and have it uploaded immediately, without loosing anything
> that's already filled in on the email for
See this:
http://ifacethoughts.net/2009/07/14/calculated-fields-in-django/
So perhaps the 'extra' query filter is what you need.
2010/10/14 Marc Aymerich :
>
>
> 2010/10/14 Marc Aymerich
>>
>>
>> 2010/10/14 Jonathan Barratt
>>>
>>> On 14 ต.ค. 2010, at 22:27, Marc Aymerich wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>
t 5:57 PM, Marc Aymerich wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Alec Shaner wrote:
>>
>> See this:
>>
>> http://ifacethoughts.net/2009/07/14/calculated-fields-in-django/
>>
>> So perhaps the 'extra' query filter is what you need.
>>
Sorry, not sure about that warning because I'm using a postgresql database.
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:17 AM, Marc Aymerich wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:39 AM, Alec Shaner wrote:
>>
>> You can't add a datetime to another datetime - you want to add a
It should be clarified that this occurs on the mysql backend, but not
the postgres backend. It has to do with how MySQL handles the DATETIME
object. You can't add a timedelta, because it expects a double.
I created a test app using a mysql backend and a Article model with
created and updated datet
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Marc Aymerich wrote:
>
> Instead of use datatime.timedelta I convert it to string with this format:
> MMDDHHMMSS and now all works fine with mysql :) Unfortunately this part
> of code doesn't be database independent :(
>
> Thank you very much alec!
>
> --
> Ma
is a ticket to add F() + timedelta.
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/10154
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Marc Aymerich wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Alec Shaner wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Marc Aymerich
>> wrote:
>> >
>&
doh! Just noticed that you already referenced ticket 10154 in your
original post.
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Alec Shaner wrote:
> Interesting solution - after all that maybe it's more concise to just
> use the 'extra' filter instead since you're making it speci
I think nother problem is your polls/urls.py is wrong. The /polls
prefix of the url will be removed by the main urls.py file before
being matched against the included polls/urls.py
http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.2/topics/http/urls/#including-other-urlconfs
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Da
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Phlip wrote:
>
> So this statement correctly fetches only the latest items:
>
> SELECT a.* FROM things a WHERE a.pid in (select max(b.pid) from
> content_entity b group by b.name)
>
> Now I thought (from my allegedly copious experience with SQL) that I
> could do
35 matches
Mail list logo
