В Вск, 08/01/2006 в 16:24 -0500, Jeffrey E. Forcier пишет:
> Oh, I see what you mean. I'm pretty sure you can just do an 'from
> myproject import settings' in your view module, then throw the
> variables from that into your template context, e.g. "context
> ['MEDIA_URL'] = settings.MEDIA_URL"
Hello. Is there an elegant way of passing more than one arguments to a
custom filter? What I do now is pass a tuple from the view to the
template that contains these arguments, and in the template, pass this
tuple to the custom filter (which in the filter is seen as the "arg"
parameter).
Thanks i
I'm working in xp box, and I want to make my app i18n support, but as
I run make-messages.py, it complain that it cann't find xgettext. So I
download it from gnu site, but as I run again, it crashed. And I want
to know is there a pure python way to do that? I know python provides
a pygettext tools
Hi,
I'm completely new to Django and started some experiments to see if it
fits my needs. Do the object-lists in the admin interface have to
possibility for up/down buttons, to move an object up and down in the
list, by adjusting a sorting value in the database. Inserting and
deleting should also
On Jan 9, 2006, at 8:43 AM, Rudolph wrote:
I'm completely new to Django and started some experiments to see if it
fits my needs. Do the object-lists in the admin interface have to
possibility for up/down buttons, to move an object up and down in the
list, by adjusting a sorting value in the data
hi Aggelos,
if you pass a tuple to your custom filter, then the arg should become
the tuple you could access. I tried something like this (for testing
purpose :):
{{ story.summary|myfilter:story }}
then inside the myfilter, I can:
def myfilter(value, arg):
story = arg
title = story.title
Hello Eric.
Thanks for your reply. As I wrote in my initial post, I have already
done this. I was wondering if there is a more elegant way.
Aggelos.
>And I want
>to know is there a pure python way to do that? I know python provides
>a pygettext tools, why not use it but xgettext?
Uh - there is no standard pygettext tool - there might be something by
that name that can be additionally installed, but the standard python
stuff doesn't include a
>Uh - there is no standard pygettext tool - there might be something by
>that name that can be additionally installed, but the standard python
Ok, to be more specific: some python installations on Linux
distributions don't have it (like some older Debian for example). But
the rest still stands: w
On 1/8/06, patrickk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > when using AddManipulator or ChangeManipulator, is there a convenient
> > way of logging actions in admin_log?
>
> hmm, something wrong with this question?
> i´d really appreciate some help.
Could you be a little more specific? Currently, admin
we´re working on a basecamp-like project management system which we´ll
include into the admin-interface.
therefore, we´re having custom views (based on Add- and
ChangeManipulator) and we´d like to log user-actions. maybe i should
just import log_add_message (e.g.) from admin.main. then again,
On 1/9/06, patrick kranzlmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> we´re working on a basecamp-like project management system which we´ll
> include into the admin-interface.
> therefore, we´re having custom views (based on Add- and
> ChangeManipulator) and we´d like to log user-actions. maybe i should
Hi all,
I'm trying to graft additional functionality onto an admin site I have
running and decided that CSV was a good start...
I have a urlconf that does this;
(r'^CSV/$', 'djangomysql.apps.subjcentre.views.change_list'),
and the change_list method in 'views' looks like this;
def change_li
On Monday 09 January 2006 08:31, tonemcd wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm trying to graft additional functionality onto an admin site I have
> running and decided that CSV was a good start...
>
> I have a urlconf that does this;
> (r'^CSV/$', 'djangomysql.apps.subjcentre.views.change_list'),
>
> and the
Hi,
I have a model with multiple companies (Basecamp Style), where each
have multiple users and multiple company news. Which of the two way is
more appropriate:
1: Company -one-to-many> User one-to-many> NewsPosting
2: Company -one-to-many> User
|o
within a view you could use
news_list = news.get_list(user__id__exact=request.user.id)
for the logged-in user
to get the user within the template use
news.get_user.username
...
http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/db_api/#many-to-one-relations
hope that helps,
patrick
>
> Hi,
>
> I hav
Thanks Patrick,
So, you are voting for the second model. I think Django should have
such relationship builtin where I can avoid defining user_id as a field
in my news table.
I maybe wrong but I don't think (news.get_user.username) works in
templates. I have to double check.
Regards,
Mike
> Thanks Patrick,
>
> So, you are voting for the second model. I think Django should have
> such relationship builtin where I can avoid defining user_id as a field
> in my news table.
actually, i don´t really see a difference between model 1 and 2.
you have a company which you assign users to. t
On 1/8/06, John Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Adrian. What I'm actually wondering about though is whether
> there is a "proper" way to clear out a session entirely? Is it just a
> matter of iterating through all of the keys and clearing them one by
> one? And on that note, I keep feel
Thanks Patrick,
> actually, i don´t really see a difference between model 1 and 2.
In model 1, there is no direct relationship between the company table
and posting table, and for the company to find out what news it has, it
has to go through the users table. Also, for a posting to find out to
w
On 1/9/06, Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a model with multiple companies (Basecamp Style), where each
> have multiple users and multiple company news. Which of the two way is
> more appropriate:
>
> 1: Company -one-to-many> User one-to-many> NewsPosting
>
> 2: Company --
Adrian Holovaty napisał(a):
>>Thanks Adrian. What I'm actually wondering about though is whether
>>there is a "proper" way to clear out a session entirely? Is it just a
>>matter of iterating through all of the keys and clearing them one by
>>one? And on that note, I keep feeling like a user, upon
Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
Sure, go for it. Let me know when it's done and I'll add links to Google
to the page.
Update: full video and Django part are successfully uploaded and
"currently being verified" (whatever it means). Apparently it takes a
lot of time. RoR part and Q&A part are in th
My approach is, if you would often be needing to get list of news both
by company and user, for performance reason I would put both foreignkey
(one 2 many) to company and user in newsposting model. That way, the
resulting join query only need to join maximum of two tables and be
faster. Alth
Having said that, I just remembered there's a common practice in
designing database that I could never done in any ORM (not only
django's), and that is to have a group of fields as primary key. Ie:
Company table
- company id (pk)
- name
Employee
- company id (pk)
-
2006/1/9, hugo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >Uh - there is no standard pygettext tool - there might be something by
> >that name that can be additionally installed, but the standard python
>
> Ok, to be more specific: some python installations on Linux
> distributions don't have it (like some older De
Adrian,
Actually, this was the 'aha' answer to my question. Thank you. On a
different note, is there anyway to implement approach #2, having
NewsPosting have a user_id field in django-way? If not so, is there any
reason why not?
Regards,
Mike
On 1/9/06, Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, this was the 'aha' answer to my question. Thank you. On a
> different note, is there anyway to implement approach #2, having
> NewsPosting have a user_id field in django-way? If not so, is there any
> reason why not?
I wouldn't recommend appr
Dody,
> ...for performance reason I would put both foreignkey
> (one 2 many) to company and user in newsposting model...
I was actually thinking about that, was wondering if it breaks the
system for some unknown reason. I am glad it is common practice and I
can count on it within my application.
> I wouldn't recommend approach #2, because it's a slightly messy
> database layout, but it would still work with Django as long as the
> "user" field of NewsPosting was a ForeignKey(User).
Thanks for your response,
Mike
On Tuesday 10 Jan 2006 9:12 am, Mike wrote:
> Thank you for your elaborate and informative response. I guess I
> fail to properly understand the significance of Primary Keys.
> Isn't it there just to make our records Unique? Then, who cares
> if the other XXX_id's are unique or not! I'd rather imp
Kenneth,
> the whole idea of having an rdbms is that it maintains
> integrity of data. And data without unique primary keys is not
> data, it is junk
Well, if my app can't manage to respect the data integrity, then my app
is junk! I have no objection against data integrity either, redundant
but
I am experimenting with Django and MS SQL and it appears that Django is
passing parameters to MS SQL in an incorrect format.
The params are being passed in as a format string style (%s), which MS
SQL chokes on.
Is anyone here using MS SQL that might be able to shed some light on
this problem? I'
On Tuesday 10 Jan 2006 9:51 am, Mike wrote:
> hemm. So, database by definition is heavy/inefficient in regard
> to scalability? If so, please instruct me with some pointers
> where I can better approach my current project as I am still in
> planning phase.
sorry, i had a bad morning with someone
>Thanks. But I installed python 2.4.2, there are pygettext.py and
>msgfmt.py in tools folder. So I think they are standard tools in
>offical python release.
Django still supports Python 2.3, so scripts need to be able to run
with Python 2.3.
bye, Georg
2006/1/10, hugo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >Thanks. But I installed python 2.4.2, there are pygettext.py and
> >msgfmt.py in tools folder. So I think they are standard tools in
> >offical python release.
>
> Django still supports Python 2.3, so scripts need to be able to run
> with Python 2.3.
>
:)
In my experience, some designers used primary key to enforce logical
parent/child relationship (where the parent's pk is prefixed into one of
the child's primay key), and usually to signify the pk fields to be
"uneditable" since it actually also doubles as "foreignkey", the value
refer to the
hi
what are the best practices for translating content in the database,
and storing that? I feel that for postgres, a separate schema for
each language may be good - that way, just something like
django-admin.py install new language would just duplicate the
necessary tables in a separate schem
Thanks for the reminder Eric, I found that link a while ago, looked at
it again yesterday and came up with this derivation of Adrians' code
that works using a query inline;
import csv
def output(request):
response = HttpResponse(mimetype='text/csv')
response['Content-Disposition'] = 'atta
I'm faced with the multiple-schema problem in MySQL, which AFAICT is a
lot simpler than actually having multiple databases because at least
you don't have to coordinate multiple connections. Actually, it
basically already works. I wrote
class Poll(meta.Model):
class META:
db_table = "
When writing a method for one of my model classes, I find that I want
to access a function from another module. The reference documentation
(http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/model_api/#model-methods)
is plenty clear on the fact that you can't just import a module at the
top of the model-
41 matches
Mail list logo
