Re: sqlobject vs. django

Robert Hicks wrote: I am not sure what you are saying here. Since SQLObject is under the LGPL, your application can be under anything you want it to be. There is no ambiguity. Right... the only exception is that if you make changes to SQLObject itself. The cool thing about the LGPL is that

Re: sqlobject vs. django

I am not sure what you are saying here. Since SQLObject is under the LGPL, your application can be under anything you want it to be. There is no ambiguity. Robert

Re: sqlobject vs. django

braver wrote: > Now that my appetite is whetted by the cris-py fresh Object-Relational > Managers, I keep collecting and comparing them. So far I've found that > ruby's ActiveRecord is separable from RoR, and I found SQLobject.org, a > totally pythonic ORM (but no cigar... i.e., web). So it beg

sqlobject vs. django

Now that my appetite is whetted by the cris-py fresh Object-Relational Managers, I keep collecting and comparing them. So far I've found that ruby's ActiveRecord is separable from RoR, and I found SQLobject.org, a totally pythonic ORM (but no cigar... i.e., web). So it begs the question -- what