Re: saving M2M with through table behavior change - (r.10189 vs. r.10190)

Excellent. Thanks for the fix! On Aug 24, 5:55 am, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 6:27 AM, David Haas wrote: > > > Hi: > > > Yet again, I've run into a behavior change which seems to be linked to > > svn revision 10190.  I've figured out a workaround for my code, but > > I

Re: saving M2M with through table behavior change - (r.10189 vs. r.10190)

On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 6:27 AM, David Haas wrote: > > Hi: > > Yet again, I've run into a behavior change which seems to be linked to > svn revision 10190.  I've figured out a workaround for my code, but > I'm wondering if someone could provide some feedback if the change is > just a definition of

saving M2M with through table behavior change - (r.10189 vs. r.10190)

Hi: Yet again, I've run into a behavior change which seems to be linked to svn revision 10190. I've figured out a workaround for my code, but I'm wondering if someone could provide some feedback if the change is just a definition of previously undefined behavior, or a bug. I've pasted some demo