well this sounds good..
thanks for the information russell .
Mulianto
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Russell Keith-Magee <
russ...@keith-magee.com> wrote:
>
> On Sunday, August 14, 2011, Phang Mulianto wrote:
> > Thanks Reinout for the response,
> >
> > i read the doc , just in time compilat
On Sunday, August 14, 2011, Phang Mulianto wrote:
> Thanks Reinout for the response,
>
> i read the doc , just in time compilation to Python bytecode is used in
jinja..
>
> is django default template also do this ?
>
> which i see the reason why jinja faster.
Django's template engine doesn't curr
Thanks Reinout for the response,
i read the doc , just in time compilation to Python bytecode is used in
jinja..
is django default template also do this ?
which i see the reason why jinja faster.
mulianto
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Reinout van Rees wrote:
> On 13-08-11 14:41, Phang Muli
On 13-08-11 14:41, Phang Mulianto wrote:
and i read about jinja template, why it can be faster than django
template engine ?
Jinja basically uses django's syntax, but (if my memory is correct) it
allows you to do more things than django's templates allows you to.
Is it faster? I thought ther
Hi all,
i need sugestion about templating.
if i use many include in django template, is it a good practice and effect
the load performance of the application ?
and i read about jinja template, why it can be faster than django template
engine ?
how many of you prefer jinja, and why ?
thanks all
5 matches
Mail list logo