Yes, that's what I was suggesting. Sorry for not being more clear.
As for storing the field twice, unless you're planning to have huge
amounts of records, you wouldn't really noticed any difference at
all. Also, you can have the admin interface set to *not* display the
stripped version, so your
Creating a duplicate field without tags looks like it might be the way
to go, then. I just hate the redundancy of two fields of data.
Thanks to both you and Jeff!
May
On Feb 6, 12:30 pm, Karen Tracey wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 3:05 PM, May wrote:
>
> > I have data entry clerks typing th
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 3:05 PM, May wrote:
>
> I have data entry clerks typing the data, so I cannot have them type
> the titles twice.
I'm quite sure Jeff wasn't suggesting having anyone type the titles in
twice. Rather, when something with a title is saved, you have code (maybe
in a save() o
Hello,
I have data entry clerks typing the data, so I cannot have them type
the titles twice. Is there a command where I could strip the tags out
after the keywords are typed but before python goes to the database to
search?
This is the def:
query = request.GET.get('q', '')
if query:
The issue has nothing to do with your templates--it has to do with
your data, and how you're searching it. In the database, you have
stored "Survival of Shigella". If you do a regular text
search (field__contains, or similar) for "Survival of Shigella",
you'll never get a match, because those st
In the database I need to italics species names ex. Survival of
Shigella
In the search template I use the following:
Search for Publications:
When a user types in "Survival of Shigella" the search code finds no
record, because I think the tags are hindering the search
someho
6 matches
Mail list logo
