Django-jwt use cookie instead of Authorization header
I want to build the SPA application using Django Rest Framework as a
back-end. The application will use JsonWebToken authentication.
For maximum security, I want to store the authentication token inside of
httpOnly cookie, so it will not be
Thank you Ronit.
Now I implemented the create_user via web request.
Django Rocks!
Ezequias.
On Thursday, September 12, 2019 at 4:27:03 AM UTC-3, Ronit Mishra wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Its possible. And from what I am able to understand you're looking to
> create restful services for authentication a
Hi,
Its possible. And from what I am able to understand you're looking to
create restful services for authentication and registration.
Your solution: Django Rest Framework
Its a very detailed procedure so I can't point out all the points here, but
you can follow any decent tutorial and get it ac
Dear Gabriel
I have already access to the get method but not the creation service.
I will have a creation of thousands of users from another system I am
integrating. Would be nice if I have an easy way to create this creation
way by loading from a list.
Have you any idea how could I perform th
...and why you don't use the Django admin app ?
El lun., 9 sept. 2019 a las 15:00, Ezequias Rocha ()
escribió:
> Hi everyone
>
> Could someone tell me if Django encourages the community to implement
> auth/user authentication and user creation via http requests?
>
> I would like to *create *new
Hi everyone
Could someone tell me if Django encourages the community to implement
auth/user authentication and user creation via http requests?
I would like to *create *new users and *get users list* via a simple
POST/GET http requests.
Have someone did it here?
Sincerely
Ezequias
--
You re
Did you log in?
Em sexta-feira, 7 de dezembro de 2018 09:21:51 UTC-2, Akash utreja escreveu:
>
> Hi,
> I am building authorization in django framework using python.. The problem
> is that my code is working fine on local server but when I run the same in
> production it returns
Hi,
I am building authorization in django framework using python.. The problem
is that my code is working fine on local server but when I run the same in
production it returns "Anonymous User"
Am I doing it right?
if request.user.has_perm('auth.access_admin')
Hey every on please visit my blog on authorization in django
<https://medium.com/@amarsavalagi/authorization-in-django-webapp-cbd0b6ea18ce>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group an
Hi,
Not to offend anyone, but django.contrib.auth is quite limited. At some
point I have decided that something should be done with that. Here is my
attempt to change something - Talos application. I tried to implement as
much as I considered reasonable, but not everything I ever saw in real
w
I was able to resolve the issue.
In mixins.py, .get_object() was unresolvable so I inherited from
SingleObjectMixin also I had to use the id to check equality.
from django.contrib.auth.mixins import LoginRequiredMixin
from django.core.exceptions import PermissionDenied
from django.views.generic.d
There's a typo
in
> if request.user.is_authenticated() and request.user is not
> self.get_object().owner.user:
It is
> if request.user.is_authenticated() and request.user is not
> self.get_object().author.user:
But still, it doesn't work. Same issue persists.
--
You received this message b
Can someone point out what is wrong in the code?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group
dMixin and for
Topic authorization, I'm trying to create custom mixin UserAuthorMixin, but
I'm having trouble to get it working. The implementation below works same
for author's own topics and other author's post.
views.py
from django.views import generic
> from
JWT Token to be passed with every call. The
> request I am attempting to pass is PUT request and my question is where to
> place the header for the JWT token authorization. I have tried the
> following format and I get a error Could not resolve host: —H curl: (6)
> Could not resolv
to
place the header for the JWT token authorization. I have tried the
following format and I get a error Could not resolve host: —H curl: (6)
Could not resolve host: Authorization:
curl -X PUT -H "Authorization: JWT " -d "field=value"
"https://url/update_record/
I like JWT authentication coupled with AngularJS:
https://github.com/GetBlimp/django-rest-framework-jwt
On 06/18/2015 08:00 PM, Daniel Grace wrote:
What is the preferred way of adding social authorization to a Django /
REST app?
I see that there are at least two packages:
django-rest
ed way of adding social authorization to a Django /
> REST app?
>
> I see that there are at least two packages:
> django-rest-framework-social-oauth2 (see
> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/django-rest-framework-social-oauth2/0.0.4)
> and django-rest-auth (see
> http:
What is the preferred way of adding social authorization to a Django / REST
app?
I see that there are at least two packages:
django-rest-framework-social-oauth2 (see
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/django-rest-framework-social-oauth2/0.0.4)
and django-rest-auth (see
http://django-rest
i added
v1_api.register(ArtistResource())
in my main url
and this is the code in meta class
class Meta:
queryset = Artist.objects.all()
resource_name = 'artist'
#authentication = Authentication()
# authorization = Authorization()
excludes
ter terminal or console i see you
> use sqlite3
>
> i recomended install this addons in firefox for managed database sqlite3
> if you no like use console
> https://addons.mozilla.org/es/firefox/addon/sqlite-manager/
>
> Cheers
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:57 AM,
a few things to match for django1.6)
>
> It goes perfectly well untill making login page and giving authentication
> to the user.
> But when it comes to giving authorization like below it gives an error
>
> from django.contrib.auth.decorators import login_require
I am building a facebook application using Django where I am using Google
Data API (Blogger API) to read website's content.
So, what kind of authorization I should use in Google Data API to read the
website.. To be specific, what kind of OAuth authorization I should use and
how?
(I wa
On 6 sep, 06:31, Julien Castets wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I faced to the same problem than you a few weeks ago, and I found this
> :https://github.com/dominno/django-moderation#readme
> It seems to be what you're searching.
>
This reusable app seems to work for me. I will try it.
Thanks.
> Julien Caste
On 6 sep, 00:55, Mike Dewhirst wrote:
> On 6/09/2011 5:46am, Mario8k wrote:
>
> > Hello,
>
> > Does anyone knows some solution (reusable app, snippet or any idea) to
> > model an authorization workflow of data?
>
> > That is... supose that a user have restric
the user (assuming the
> person making the authorization will base their decision on who's
> making the request). Also, it'll get a little more complicated if you
> want to store values for different field types (boolean vs. string,
> for example), and maybe a boolean or a
o,
>>
>> Does anyone knows some solution (reusable app, snippet or any idea) to
>> model an authorization workflow of data?
>>
>> That is... supose that a user have restricted some model field, ie,
>> cannot edit directly this field. And now supose that he could reque
On 6/09/2011 5:46am, Mario8k wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone knows some solution (reusable app, snippet or any idea) to
model an authorization workflow of data?
That is... supose that a user have restricted some model field, ie,
cannot edit directly this field. And now supose that he could request
You could use a model with three fields:
A generic foreign key to the instance to be modified.
A char field containing the fieldname on that instance.
The new value.
Of course you'd need another field to store the user (assuming the
person making the authorization will base
Hello,
Does anyone knows some solution (reusable app, snippet or any idea) to
model an authorization workflow of data?
That is... supose that a user have restricted some model field, ie,
cannot edit directly this field. And now supose that he could request
to change that field, seeing the real
On 23 February 2011 19:03, Joakim Hove wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using Django to create an album application. I was planning to
> use djangos user system for authorization, however the final image
> viewing will be like:
>
>
>
> Where image.url should resolv
Thank you;
that was a very good starting point - I will hopefully find a solution
from this.
Joakim
On 23 Feb, 09:18, Mike Ramirez wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 23, 2011 12:03:12 am Joakim Hove wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > Any suggestions of how to combine django based
On Wednesday, February 23, 2011 12:03:12 am Joakim Hove wrote:
> Hello,
> Any suggestions of how to combine django based authorization with
> serving of static content? I am the owner of the box in question and
> can modify the apache setup way beyond my competence.
>
> Reg
Hello,
I am using Django to create an album application. I was planning to
use djangos user system for authorization, however the final image
viewing will be like:
Where image.url should resolve to something like
http://static-images.com/path/to/image.jpg
Here http://static-images.com
Djangoer:
>
> I am new to Django. Please excuse me if the question is naive.
>
> I am trying to figure out if I could integrate my company's "access
> manager" with Django's authorization.
>
> Every time a user try to login my Django application, he/she go
Dear Djangoer:
I am new to Django. Please excuse me if the question is naive.
I am trying to figure out if I could integrate my company's "access
manager" with Django's authorization.
Every time a user try to login my Django application, he/she got
redirect to "a
on is very good documented
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 18:59, Eric Chamberlain wrote:
> >
> > > On Aug 26, 2010, at 9:31 PM, nobosh wrote:
> >
> > > > Hello, I'm on day 7 learning Django and would apprec
mberlain wrote:
>
> > On Aug 26, 2010, at 9:31 PM, nobosh wrote:
>
> > > Hello, I'm on day 7 learning Django and would appreciate any info
> > > around getting my Django app started with a Registration/Authorization
> > > which is Email & Password based
te:
>
> On Aug 26, 2010, at 9:31 PM, nobosh wrote:
>
> > Hello, I'm on day 7 learning Django and would appreciate any info
> > around getting my Django app started with a Registration/Authorization
> > which is Email & Password based (not username). I'll don'
On Aug 26, 2010, at 9:31 PM, nobosh wrote:
> Hello, I'm on day 7 learning Django and would appreciate any info
> around getting my Django app started with a Registration/Authorization
> which is Email & Password based (not username). I'll don't currently
> have a
Thanks for the reply. The learning curve to get started has been
harder than I expected.
I found this: http://github.com/redvasily/django-emailauth
Which seems to handle things well but it's still a hack (it's adding
IDs in front of the email to create a username. I ran the setup.py and
loaded th
If you still want to use the contrib.auth app, you can just add your
own backend to the user authentication. It's very easy to do.
http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/auth/#writing-an-authentication-backend
There are some very smart people who prefer not to use contrib.auth
for a variety
Hello, I'm on day 7 learning Django and would appreciate any info
around getting my Django app started with a Registration/Authorization
which is Email & Password based (not username). I'll don't currently
have a need for usernames. Is there an app or a clean/smart way to
imple
resolved by adding has_perm and get_all_permisions methods to my
backend class.
Looks all methods should defined in backend, not just the one I want
to change.
On May 6, 1:53 pm, lray wrote:
> I am writing an authorization backend to get some permissions from
> custom tables. I added
I am writing an authorization backend to get some permissions from
custom tables. I added it to settings.py,
It does not appear Django is calling get_group_permissions(self) from
this backend. I had print statements and nothing got printed in
Please help.
class MyBackend(object
2009/10/13 elminio
>
> Hi,
>
> By admin I can choose what users can do with model objects. And what
> about certain pages. Do I have to write if in everyone view method (to
> check is current user may access given view ?
>
> Or is there any built in tool that makes it possible to restrict
> acces
And specifically the @login_required decorator...
On Oct 13, 12:51 pm, Daniel Roseman wrote:
> On Oct 13, 11:42 am, elminio wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > By admin I can choose what users can do with model objects. And what
> > about certain pages. Do I have to write if in everyone view method (to
> >
On Oct 13, 11:42 am, elminio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> By admin I can choose what users can do with model objects. And what
> about certain pages. Do I have to write if in everyone view method (to
> check is current user may access given view ?
>
> Or is there any built in tool that makes it possible to r
Hi,
By admin I can choose what users can do with model objects. And what
about certain pages. Do I have to write if in everyone view method (to
check is current user may access given view ?
Or is there any built in tool that makes it possible to restrict
access to given pages.
thanks for help
-
On Sep 16, 1:55 pm, Chris Babcock wrote:
> Is there any particular reason to maintain two distinct authentication
> databases? You could sub-class the Django auth models and deploy your
> subclass in parallel, but that is not a trivial deployment task. It
> would be easier to just authorize th
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
Dan06 wrote:
> Is there a way to have multiple implementations of django's
> authentication/authorization system? In my practice blog-type site,
> I've implemented django's auth/auth system as is. I'd like to use the
> d
Hi,
Is there a way to have multiple implementations of django's
authentication/authorization system? In my practice blog-type site,
I've implemented django's auth/auth system as is. I'd like to use the
default implementation solely for administrators of the site. For
users
ystem time
> and/or the field she/he attempts to edit.
>
> When user who has no authority attempts to edit something, she/he
> should received a user-friendly error message just like she/he entered
> invalid email address or leaved required field empty.
>
> How to hook thi
hook this customized validation/authorization feature into
admin site?
Thanks a lot.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to dj
Hi Malcolm,
Thanks for your clear explanation. I've already done the authorization
function by myself, if you are interesting in it, you could refer to
following coding. After analysising django's auth module, I just gave
it up for some integration reason. However, I copied some usefu
uth model. Thanks!
I think you're misunderstanding something here, due to some lazy naming
practices in Django's past. The "auth" in django.contrib.auth is for
authentication, not authorization.
It has all the utility pieces needed to authenticate a user and store
any related user
Django's auth is pretty good, however, I need some row-level
authorziation mechnism, like in which department and function that the
certain user could access, so my needs on authrization are pretty
different than default auth model. Thanks!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 01:41 -0700, Zeal wrote:
> I'm a newbie, I've been using Django to develop an application. The
> entire application need to be based on an authorization mechnism. As
> of my current programe, I just put user's id in session when they log
> in, a
I'm a newbie, I've been using Django to develop an application. The
entire application need to be based on an authorization mechnism. As
of my current programe, I just put user's id in session when they log
in, and there is a authorization decorater to judge whether a request
obje
1.2 feature now)
>
> Hi Malcolm.
>
> First of all thank you for the brief explanation.
>
> So you reckon I shouldn't use django admin for row level
> authorization?
It would be possible, as I wrote, but it would require a fair bit of
work on your side to customise things. It&#
classes and the like (although it
> might require the ChangeList class to be over-ridable, which I believe
> is a Django 1.2 feature now)
Hi Malcolm.
First of all thank you for the brief explanation.
So you reckon I shouldn't use django admin for row level
authorization?
Thanks in adva
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 00:26 +1100, Joshua Partogi wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> In django admin we can give permission to user to edit, delete or
> create certain model. But what I want to do now is a user can only
> edit or delete the data that he/she created.
>
> Is there any way we can do this in dj
Dear all,
In django admin we can give permission to user to edit, delete or
create certain model. But what I want to do now is a user can only
edit or delete the data that he/she created.
Is there any way we can do this in django admin?
Thank you very much in advance
--
If you can't believe i
Hi,
The auth-decorators to check for permission are nice, but it would
be better, if the authorization could be decoupled from calling the view.
My goal: Check if a user can access a view without calling it, because
I want to disable/hide a link if the user must not call it.
I implemented it
On Nov 13, 3:34 am, "James Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/12/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So, without having tested it, you might be able to access
> > request._req.subprocess_env to get the information (although read the
> >mod_pythondocs first, particularl
On 11/12/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, without having tested it, you might be able to access
> request._req.subprocess_env to get the information (although read the
> mod_python docs first, particularly about add_common_vars(), since
> that's certainly tripped me up in th
On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 15:55 +, Krzysztof Ciesielski wrote:
> Hi, I've got a problem with django used with mod_ssl and mod_python. I
> wanted to use environmental variables from mod_ssl in order to
> automaticly log in users but it appears that those variables are not
> accessible trough requ
On 11/12/07, Krzysztof Ciesielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I've got a problem with django used with mod_ssl and mod_python. I
> wanted to use environmental variables from mod_ssl in order to
> automaticly log in users but it appears that those variables are not
> accessible trough request
Hi, I've got a problem with django used with mod_ssl and mod_python. I
wanted to use environmental variables from mod_ssl in order to
automaticly log in users but it appears that those variables are not
accessible trough request.META Has anyone met this problem before. and
has any idea how to sol
Hi Manakel,
On Nov 6, 11:53 am, Manakel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This web application had a Authorization model at the Field level.
> []
> TASK has a progress status field and a due date field
> realisator user can only change the status field
> owner can change
Hello Everybody,
I'm kind of new to Django (less than 1week now).
I have the task to migrate an existing web application to django.
This web application had a Authorization model at the Field level.
If i take a TASK model for demonstration.
TASK has a progress status field and
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
..
>>
>> I for one am not sure; are we saying that even if I'm using flup / fastcgi as
>> the transport I'm not able to use that for authorization?
>
> That depends on whether flup supports the backend side of the FASTC
going to be happy with something that requires mod_python
> > 3.3.1?
>
> > Graham
>
> ..
>
> I for one am not sure; are we saying that even if I'm using flup / fastcgi as
> the transport I'm not able to use that for authorization?
That depends
pport, then maybe
> I'll have a brainwave and come up with something that might also work
> on mod_python (to a degree).
>
> Are you going to be happy with something that requires mod_python
> 3.3.1?
>
> Graham
..
I for one am not sure; are we saying that even if
On Sep 20, 8:39 am, "Jacob Kaplan-Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 9/19/07, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Not properly though.
>
> Indeed -- the auth handler has always been of "works-for-me" quality;
> I don't know nearly enough about Apache to write a proper one. I would
On 9/19/07, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not properly though.
Indeed -- the auth handler has always been of "works-for-me" quality;
I don't know nearly enough about Apache to write a proper one. I would
be thrilled and delighted if someone who did would step forward and
write som
On Sep 19, 10:46 pm, Robin Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>
> .
>
> >>> In 2.0 there seems no way to provide another
> >>> authorizer without writing an apache module.
> >> Correct.
>
> > Whoops. Not strictly true. You can write one with mod_python by
> > imple
On Sep 19, 10:18 pm, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > OK my code looks like the standard django/contrib/auth/modpython.py the
> > patch is
>
> > ***
> > *** 39,44
> > --- 38,54
>
> ># check the password and any permission given
> >if
pp
> >> which only does user/groups. I think this is less desirable because of the
> >> possibility of permission leakage. I can imagine exporting changes into
> >> some
> >> other project's db so this doesn't seem impossible.
>
> > Can you perhaps
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
.
>>
>>> In 2.0 there seems no way to provide another
>>> authorizer without writing an apache module.
>> Correct.
>
> Whoops. Not strictly true. You can write one with mod_python by
> implementing a authzhandler(). You just need to know what you are
> doing. ;-)
>
ct's db so this doesn't seem impossible.
>
> Can you perhaps gives some code examples of what your authn/authz code
> looks like now so I can see how you are using groups.
>
> The reason I am curious is that I am currently working on implementing
> a solution in mod_wsgi
e how you are using groups.
The reason I am curious is that I am currently working on implementing
a solution in mod_wsgi for better using Python to support Apache
authentication and authorization. Also, the other way around,
providing hooks so a Python application can use an Apache auth
provider for
I find I can use django users and groups to authorize apache locations and
directories using a modified version of modpython.py(I just hacked it to check
for required groups).
I have some difficulties with this simple scheme.
First off it seems to be completely separate from the normal django
Steven Armstrong wrote:
>
> You could then pass the groups, or whatever else you need, to the
> handler using PythonOption directives.
>
> e.g.
>
> AuthType basic
> AuthName "djauth test"
> Require valid-user
> SetEnv DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE djauth.settings
> PythonOption DjangoGroups XX
gt; I see from this documentation
>
> http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/apache_auth/#configuring-a...
>
> that it is conceptually possible to configure apache authorization using
> django.
>
> However, we have recently decided to de-couple django frommod_pythonby using
Robin Becker wrote on 06/28/07 19:44:
> Steven Armstrong wrote:
>> Robin Becker wrote on 06/28/07 16:13:
>>> I see from this documentation
>>>
>>> http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/apache_auth/#configuring-apache
>>>
>>> that it is c
Steven Armstrong wrote:
> Robin Becker wrote on 06/28/07 16:13:
>> I see from this documentation
>>
>> http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/apache_auth/#configuring-apache
>>
>> that it is conceptually possible to configure apache authorization using
Robin Becker wrote on 06/28/07 16:13:
> I see from this documentation
>
> http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/apache_auth/#configuring-apache
>
> that it is conceptually possible to configure apache authorization using
> django.
>
> However, we have recently dec
I see from this documentation
http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/apache_auth/#configuring-apache
that it is conceptually possible to configure apache authorization using django.
However, we have recently decided to de-couple django from mod_python by using
fastcgi. This is because we
I am sure this question has been asked before but haven't been able to
find the answer.
I am using the django decorator for user authentication.
My views has the line
@login_required
And my urls.py has the line
(r'^accounts/login/$', 'django.contrib.auth.views.login'),
It works fine in the dj
I would like to see these branches merged with the trunk too but lack
sufficient experience with working with trunk/branches.
What are the steps needed to merge the last change from the trunk into
the branches to keep the branches up to date ?
How would you do it ? Start with the patch committed
rovide object level
> > permissions or column level permissions at least.
> >
> > There are two branches which I see being **inactively**. being
> > developed. 1) Per-object-permissions which I feel is stable enough
> > though I have not tried nothing really significa
branches which I see being **inactively**. being
> developed. 1) Per-object-permissions which I feel is stable enough
> though I have not tried nothing really significant on that 2)
> Generic Authorization.
>
> Can someone advise the future of these two branches? Will they be
significant on that 2) Generic Authorization.
Can someone advise the future of these two branches? Will they be merged
with the main trunk?
I hear on and off that users are not testing these branches well enough, and
hence they are not being merged.
IMHO, I feel we must merge these branches into the main
94 matches
Mail list logo
