Graham Dumpleton wrote:
..
>>
>> I for one am not sure; are we saying that even if I'm using flup / fastcgi as
>> the transport I'm not able to use that for authorization?
>
> That depends on whether flup supports the backend side of the FASTCGI
> specifications authentication/authorisati
On Sep 20, 7:13 pm, Robin Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> > On Sep 20, 8:39 am, "Jacob Kaplan-Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >> On 9/19/07, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>> Not properly though.
> >> Indeed -- the auth handler has always been
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> On Sep 20, 8:39 am, "Jacob Kaplan-Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> On 9/19/07, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Not properly though.
>> Indeed -- the auth handler has always been of "works-for-me" quality;
>> I don't know nearly enough about Apache
On Sep 20, 8:39 am, "Jacob Kaplan-Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 9/19/07, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Not properly though.
>
> Indeed -- the auth handler has always been of "works-for-me" quality;
> I don't know nearly enough about Apache to write a proper one. I would
On 9/19/07, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not properly though.
Indeed -- the auth handler has always been of "works-for-me" quality;
I don't know nearly enough about Apache to write a proper one. I would
be thrilled and delighted if someone who did would step forward and
write som
On Sep 19, 10:46 pm, Robin Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>
> .
>
> >>> In 2.0 there seems no way to provide another
> >>> authorizer without writing an apache module.
> >> Correct.
>
> > Whoops. Not strictly true. You can write one with mod_python by
> > imple
On Sep 19, 10:18 pm, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > OK my code looks like the standard django/contrib/auth/modpython.py the
> > patch is
>
> > ***
> > *** 39,44
> > --- 38,54
>
> ># check the password and any permission given
> >if
On Sep 19, 10:05 pm, Robin Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> > On Sep 19, 3:05 am, Robin Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I find I can use django users and groups to authorize apache locations and
> >> directories using a modified version of modpython.py(I just ha
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
.
>>
>>> In 2.0 there seems no way to provide another
>>> authorizer without writing an apache module.
>> Correct.
>
> Whoops. Not strictly true. You can write one with mod_python by
> implementing a authzhandler(). You just need to know what you are
> doing. ;-)
>
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> On Sep 19, 3:05 am, Robin Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I find I can use django users and groups to authorize apache locations and
>> directories using a modified version of modpython.py(I just hacked it to
>> check
>> for required groups).
>>
>> I have some diffi
On Sep 19, 3:05 am, Robin Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I find I can use django users and groups to authorize apache locations and
> directories using a modified version of modpython.py(I just hacked it to check
> for required groups).
>
> I have some difficulties with this simple scheme.
>
I find I can use django users and groups to authorize apache locations and
directories using a modified version of modpython.py(I just hacked it to check
for required groups).
I have some difficulties with this simple scheme.
First off it seems to be completely separate from the normal django
12 matches
Mail list logo
