Re: Webfaction vs DigitalOcean

2013-04-03 Thread Frankline
I love the simplicity of Webfaction and I'm happy with it. On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:10 PM, frocco wrote: > Very happy with webfaction and their support. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Django users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group an

Re: Webfaction vs DigitalOcean

2013-04-03 Thread frocco
Very happy with webfaction and their support. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, s

Re: Webfaction vs DigitalOcean

2013-04-02 Thread Venkatraman S
Well, a problem with DO is the inability to add disk space without changing plans. On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:20 AM, Carlos Daniel Ruvalcaba Valenzuela < clsdan...@gmail.com> wrote: > As a user of both, I got to say they are a bit different, webfaction > brings the easy of deploying of the classica

Re: Webfaction vs DigitalOcean

2013-04-02 Thread Carlos Daniel Ruvalcaba Valenzuela
As a user of both, I got to say they are a bit different, webfaction brings the easy of deploying of the classical web hosting to django, while digital ocean is more like "cloud based vps". With webfaction you don't have to setup much, if all you use is mysql/postgresql it is very nice, DO you hav

Webfaction vs DigitalOcean

2013-04-02 Thread Venkatraman S
I know Webfaction has been a favourite for many of us, but was wondering if anyone moved to DO from Webfaction and has any praises to sing. Any feedback? -Venkat -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To unsubscribe from this group an