Re: Using mod_python with Lighttpd - advice on the best set up

2008-09-30 Thread Kip Parker
Sounds good, how did you get it to do that? On Sep 30, 1:03 pm, Erik Allik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Apache can also start/restart your FastCGI process(es) as needed. > > Erik > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go

Re: Using mod_python with Lighttpd - advice on the best set up

2008-09-30 Thread Erik Allik
Apache can also start/restart your FastCGI process(es) as needed. Erik On 30.09.2008, at 13:33, Graham Dumpleton wrote: > > > > On Sep 30, 8:24 pm, Kip Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> After both your replies and some googling I'm starting to lean >> towards >> a FastCGI set up of some so

Re: Using mod_python with Lighttpd - advice on the best set up

2008-09-30 Thread Graham Dumpleton
On Sep 30, 8:24 pm, Kip Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After both your replies and some googling I'm starting to lean towards > a FastCGI set up of some sort. The only thing that worries me is > dealing with FastCGI crashes, I guess you need a process watcher for > each site/FastCGI instanc

Re: Using mod_python with Lighttpd - advice on the best set up

2008-09-30 Thread Kip Parker
After both your replies and some googling I'm starting to lean towards a FastCGI set up of some sort. The only thing that worries me is dealing with FastCGI crashes, I guess you need a process watcher for each site/FastCGI instance, what's that like to maintain in practice? On Sep 29, 8:53 pm, Pr

Re: Using mod_python with Lighttpd - advice on the best set up

2008-09-29 Thread Prairie Dogg
Conventional wisdom is that mod_python eats a little more memory than a correctly configured mod_wsgi. Here are some nice posts about using mod_wsgi in low memory environments: http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi/browse_thread/thread/d21c334972fc8d37 http://www.technobabble.dk/2008/aug/25/dja

Re: Using mod_python with Lighttpd - advice on the best set up

2008-09-29 Thread Kip Parker
Thanks Frank, that's very interesting. A lack of complaining users is much to be desired. Have you ever used this set up for multiple sites? I have about 20 sites running, and there may well be more in the future. It would be excellent also to know what you found painful about mod_python. All th

Re: Using mod_python with Lighttpd - advice on the best set up

2008-09-29 Thread Frantisek Malina
I updated the post for you. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL

Re: Using mod_python with Lighttpd - advice on the best set up

2008-09-29 Thread Frantisek Malina
I wrote a post for you on my blog: http://vizualbod.com/articles/nginx-fastcgiwsgi-django-deployment I've tried mod_python and it was a pain. Frank http://vizualbod.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Using mod_python with Lighttpd - advice on the best set up

2008-09-29 Thread Kip Parker
Having had a few problems with memory usage on my Django sites, I've realised a problem with my current set up is that apache is serving media files as well as doing all the mod_python django stuff. The recommended solution I keep coming across is to serve media files from a separate lightweight