Re: Tag Definition

2006-07-22 Thread James Bennett
On 7/21/06, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The recommended way to do this is to create an application that only > holds your custom tags. Applications don't have to have models or views > or anything like that. That also makes it easy to reuse your tags in > other projects: you ju

Re: Tag Definition

2006-07-21 Thread Martin
Malcolm, thanks for the suggestion... I tried it and it wokrs like expected. I don't know why, but I had the impression that an application only load templatetags define it it's own namespace. I should have read the documentation a more carefully. Thanks, Martin --~--~-~--~~--

Re: Tag Definition

2006-07-21 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 02:39 +, Martin wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering what is the best way to define new tags which don't > really belong to a specific application. > For example, I would like to create a urlmatch tag: > > {% urlmatch "^accouonts/login/$" } >Should only be display the c

Tag Definition

2006-07-21 Thread Martin
Hi, I was wondering what is the best way to define new tags which don't really belong to a specific application. For example, I would like to create a urlmatch tag: {% urlmatch "^accouonts/login/$" } Should only be display the current url matches the specified reg-ex {% endurlmatch %} Lookin