Re: Subclassing a form, changing one field into required = False

2008-05-05 Thread LaundroMat
On 5 mei, 14:39, "Karen Tracey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 7:08 AM, LaundroMat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1 mei, 13:43, "Karen Tracey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 7:22 AM, LaundroMat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi - > > > > > Wou

Re: Subclassing a form, changing one field into required = False

2008-05-05 Thread Karen Tracey
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 7:08 AM, LaundroMat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1 mei, 13:43, "Karen Tracey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 7:22 AM, LaundroMat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi - > > > > > Would it be possible to subclass a form class, and in that subclass

Re: Subclassing a form, changing one field into required = False

2008-05-05 Thread LaundroMat
On 1 mei, 13:43, "Karen Tracey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 7:22 AM, LaundroMat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi - > > > Would it be possible to subclass a form class, and in that subclass > > define that one of the fields that were required in the parent class > > are

Re: Subclassing a form, changing one field into required = False

2008-05-01 Thread Karen Tracey
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 7:22 AM, LaundroMat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi - > > Would it be possible to subclass a form class, and in that subclass > define that one of the fields that were required in the parent class > are no longer required in the subclass? > You mean like this? >>> from d

Subclassing a form, changing one field into required = False

2008-05-01 Thread LaundroMat
Hi - Would it be possible to subclass a form class, and in that subclass define that one of the fields that were required in the parent class are no longer required in the subclass? Thanks, Mathieu --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are s