Better would mean something beyond full-text features that are built
in mysql (MATCH AGAINST or LIKE). Perhaps an engine that also supports
logical operators (in, or, without...), one-line searches etc.
As for Sphenix, real time indexing is a big issue and a drawback. But
I think that it should b
Malcolm Tredinnick napisał(a):
>> Is there any
>> other way to implement advanced searching (better than Q search that
>> is) that is better documented?
>
> What does "better" mean here? There are lots of ways to search over
> database tables, but they all carry trade-offs. Either the API if mo
On Sun, 2007-12-23 at 05:37 -0800, maco wrote:
> Yes, I've seen that, thanks anyway.
>
> I've been googling for the past few days on this topic and I'm amazed
> that there is so little info about Sphenix on Django.
Why are you amazed? It's not something that everybody is going to want
to do and
Yes, I've seen that, thanks anyway.
I've been googling for the past few days on this topic and I'm amazed
that there is so little info about Sphenix on Django. Is there any
other way to implement advanced searching (better than Q search that
is) that is better documented?
cheers
m
On 22 dec.,
On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 14:36 -0800, maco wrote:
> Can someone please write a quick-start for this search engine on
> Django. I've already set up django app and sphinix search engine in a
> shell. There are some basic instructions in the snippets, but are not
> that self explanatory to a noob like
Can someone please write a quick-start for this search engine on
Django. I've already set up django app and sphinix search engine in a
shell. There are some basic instructions in the snippets, but are not
that self explanatory to a noob like me :(
I got lost with how to implement this in the proj
6 matches
Mail list logo
