On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 2:51 AM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] <
cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk> wrote:
>
> This is pretty much the only list I *enjoy* being a part of, and it
> probably wouldn't be like this unless certain etiquette was enforced.
>
>
What? Why the "only*? Do they more
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> Hi Bobby --
>
> I'm quite sorry if you took my words as a threat. Such wasn't my
> intent -- at all. I'm simply trying to make clear certain community
> expectations. You're completely right that banning would be wildly
> inappropriate, a
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> Hi Bobby --
>
> I'm quite sorry if you took my words as a threat. Such wasn't my
> intent -- at all. I'm simply trying to make clear certain community
> expectations. You're completely right that banning would be wildly
> inappropriate, a
Just for the record, this topic was also posted on the Satchmo list and
there are some decent performance improvement related discussions. No doubt
there are configurations of Satchmo that result in less than desirable speed
but there are some real life comments/examples from folks running big
Django is the best thing since the Civil Rights
Movement.
Satchmo is ok for the most part except for certain things
which do not work unless you correct the errors in the programming.
I'm sorry for ranting on the board.
I will never rant again.
@bloatedmanat
Django is the next best thing to Emancipation.
I like Satchmo for the most part.
I'll keep my rants off list.
. I promise. You can follow me on
twitter @bloatedmanatee from now on.
Thanks for setting me straight everyone!
On Jul 29, 1:14 pm, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> Hi Bobby --
>
>
Hi Bobby --
I'm quite sorry if you took my words as a threat. Such wasn't my
intent -- at all. I'm simply trying to make clear certain community
expectations. You're completely right that banning would be wildly
inappropriate, and I certainly wasn't suggesting that.
The Django community has histo
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Bobby Roberts wrote:
> opinions on software should never be taken personally and should never
> be silenced. I take heat over programming on a daily basis just as I
> have for the past 30 years. It's part of the business. Good
> programmers take it, grow from i
opinions on software should never be taken personally and should never
be silenced. I take heat over programming on a daily basis just as I
have for the past 30 years. It's part of the business. Good
programmers take it, grow from it and come back with a better product.
There was no slight inte
Personally, I don't see why this has caused such a fuss.
It is quite obvious from OPs original message that it was a bit of light
hearted humor.
I think the most appropriate response here would be "loosen up..?"
Cal
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 20
On 2011-07-29, at 01:26 , Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> Yes, it really was. He opened a request for a subject line and first
> sentence by comparing Satchmo to a fat, ungainly animal.
Now here I draw the line, this is not acceptable. Manatees have feelings too.
--
You received this message because
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]
wrote:
> Hold on, we are in danger of restricting the freedom of speech on this
> mailing list.
There is no right to free speech on a mailing list.
We already restrict what's allowed on this list. Beekeeping, wool
socks, hand g
On Jul 28, 2011, at 4:26 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
> Yes, it really was. He opened a request for a subject line and first
> sentence by comparing Satchmo to a fat, ungainly animal. That's isn't
> a productive way to begin a request for help.
Now let's not dis the manatee. Here's a manate
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Bobby Roberts
>> wrote:
>> > satchmo has become a bloated manatee of a codebase.
>>
>> Hey, this isn't OK. I can tel
I have one cart running over 17K SKUs that is fast. (save for
generating product variations). It's hosted at Webfaction with a
hosting plan less powerful than yours. Have you checked the basics.
Debug mode off. Caching on. (I am not even using memcached. Just
file.). I am using Postgres.
The Sat
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Bobby Roberts
> wrote:
> > satchmo has become a bloated manatee of a codebase.
>
> Hey, this isn't OK. I can tell you're frustrated, but insulting other
> people's work isn't acceptable around here. You
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Bobby Roberts wrote:
> satchmo has become a bloated manatee of a codebase.
Hey, this isn't OK. I can tell you're frustrated, but insulting other
people's work isn't acceptable around here. You should realize there
are real people, just like you, on the other side
satchmo has become a bloated manatee of a codebase. Does anyone know
why it run so slowly now? Or, do you have to feed it treats or
something secretive to get it running properly? I've got two satchmo
sites on a 256mb slice at slicehost and they are pretty much unusable
at the moment.
--
You r
18 matches
Mail list logo
