Bryan Murdock wrote:
>
> As for Eugene's example, firefox does display it, and confirms that
> the content-type header was application/xml. That isn't what django
> sets for Rss201rev2Feeds. Maybe, Eugene, you are overriding that
> somewhere in your code?
Yes, I override it. I remember having
On 6/13/06, Bryan Murdock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And it sets them just as James indicates. That probably explains why
> firefox isn't displaying them like I wish.
Firefox is doing the right thing. Displaying raw XML to an end user is
not a good thing, and is more likely to make the user th
On 6/13/06, coulix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> applocation/rss+xml is what appears in the http headers.
> It does not get display as an xml doc however :/
This is because browsers are NOT supposed to display feeds as XML documents.
Think of it like PDF -- instead of displaying the raw source te
On 6/13/06, Bryan Murdock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/13/06, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 6/12/06, Eugene Lazutkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I suspect the difference is
> > > due to different MIME type of these feeds --- I use 'application/xml',
> > > which I be
applocation/rss+xml is what appears in the http headers.
It does not get display as an xml doc however :/
http://127.0.0.1:8000/feeds/nouvelles/
GET /feeds/nouvelles/ HTTP/1.1
Host: 127.0.0.1:8000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr; rv:1.8.0.4)
Gecko/20060508 Firefox/1.5.0.4
A
On 6/13/06, Bryan Murdock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So are those the MIME types that django is returning for rss feeds (in
> other words, how do I find out what MIME type django is using for
> these)? In that case and from what you are saying, firefox is doing
> the correct thing in asking me
On 6/13/06, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 6/12/06, Eugene Lazutkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I suspect the difference is
> > due to different MIME type of these feeds --- I use 'application/xml',
> > which I believe is the correct one.
>
> application/rss+xml for RSS
> appli
On 6/12/06, Eugene Lazutkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suspect the difference is
> due to different MIME type of these feeds --- I use 'application/xml',
> which I believe is the correct one.
application/rss+xml for RSS
application/atom+xml for Atom
Browsers should prompt to download on thes
Bryan Murdock wrote:
> OK, it's the same with Internet Exploder. Here's two links to click
> on and see if it's the same for you:
>
> Displays nicely:
>
> http://www.blueskyonmars.com/?feed=rss&cat=19
>
> Doesn't:
>
> http://www.djangoproject.com/rss/weblog/
>
> Bryan
My feed displays nicel
On Monday 12 June 2006 15:17, Bryan Murdock wrote:
> OK, it's the same with Internet Exploder. Here's two links to click
> on and see if it's the same for you:
>
> Displays nicely:
>
> http://www.blueskyonmars.com/?feed=rss&cat=19
>
> Doesn't:
>
> http://www.djangoproject.com/rss/weblog/
>
> Brya
OK, it's the same with Internet Exploder. Here's two links to click
on and see if it's the same for you:
Displays nicely:
http://www.blueskyonmars.com/?feed=rss&cat=19
Doesn't:
http://www.djangoproject.com/rss/weblog/
Bryan
On 6/12/06, Bryan Murdock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Djangonauts,
11 matches
Mail list logo