-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: html5 + Django
I suggest Nginx to serve your static files, and possibly also as a reverse
proxy to point to your Django with Gunicorn/Apache setup (If you haven't
considered Gunicorn as a production server yet, please do. It is fantastic).
On Mon, A
Thanks guys, both posts helped.
Cheers.
On Tuesday, 1 May 2012 01:51:08 UTC+8, HarpB wrote:
>
> It is much better to use Apache for static files than Django. You can
> still run DJango for data validation, but all static content is typically
> served via Apache. In your virtualhost, you should
I suggest Nginx to serve your static files, and possibly also as a reverse
proxy to point to your Django with Gunicorn/Apache setup (If you haven't
considered Gunicorn as a production server yet, please do. It is fantastic).
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:21 PM, HarpB wrote:
> It is much better to u
It is much better to use Apache for static files than Django. You can still
run DJango for data validation, but all static content is typically served
via Apache. In your virtualhost, you should proxy the /static/ endpoint to
the /static/ folder in Django app.
On Sunday, April 29, 2012 5:39:15
4 matches
Mail list logo
