Ok, thanks Graham, will do.
On 11 Jan 2009, at 10:45, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jan 11, 7:59 pm, Ben Eliott wrote:
>> Hi Graham,
>> Just following up on this thread. I replied with some details, but
>> maybe you missed those, or maybe i missed your reply. Or maybe this
>> isn't worth i
On Jan 11, 7:59 pm, Ben Eliott wrote:
> Hi Graham,
> Just following up on this thread. I replied with some details, but
> maybe you missed those, or maybe i missed your reply. Or maybe this
> isn't worth it and i should stop being lazy and just write out the
> VirtualHost files :)
I miss
Hi Graham,
Just following up on this thread. I replied with some details, but
maybe you missed those, or maybe i missed your reply. Or maybe this
isn't worth it and i should stop being lazy and just write out the
VirtualHost files :)
Ben
On 23 Dec 2008, at 01:13, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>
I just saw your message below after sending the vhost.
I don't think i'd mind whether it's separate processes or one really
fat one. I think perhaps separate processes with a quite a short
inactivity timeout might work quite well? I'd rather keep the overall
footprint as small as feasible,
Strange, that thread is down for me. Maybe it has something to do with
cacheing in a different locale...
Anyhow, the idea is to create a new django instance and point to
different settings.py files for different wildcard subdomains. here
is current Vhost:
ServerAlias *.stayunstuck.co.uk
Have some further questions about what you want to do.
Do you want a separate daemon process for each distinct Django site,
or are you happy with one really fat process which contains each
Django site in a separate sub interpreter of that process?
How much memory does each Django site instance t
On Dec 22, 9:44 pm, Ben Eliott wrote:
> Hi Graham,
> I've finally managed to get back to the wildcard subdomains & mod_wsgi
> today. Unfortunately the discussion thread you mentioned has
> disappeared and after a few hours i still seem to be doing a good job
> of getting nowhere.
I can s
Hi Graham,
I've finally managed to get back to the wildcard subdomains & mod_wsgi
today. Unfortunately the discussion thread you mentioned has
disappeared and after a few hours i still seem to be doing a good job
of getting nowhere.
Although you mentioned using mod_rewrite to get hold of th
Understood. Thanks.
On 9 Dec 2008, at 10:18, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>
>
>
> On Dec 9, 8:05 pm, Ben Eliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Graham,
>> Thank you for coming back personally to such a lowly wsgi question! I
>> started reading your email and thinking the answer was 'no', then
>> ended
On Dec 9, 8:05 pm, Ben Eliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Graham,
> Thank you for coming back personally to such a lowly wsgi question! I
> started reading your email and thinking the answer was 'no', then
> ended up thinking 'definitely maybe'. I'll keep an eye out in case you
> post mor
Graham,
Thank you for coming back personally to such a lowly wsgi question! I
started reading your email and thinking the answer was 'no', then
ended up thinking 'definitely maybe'. I'll keep an eye out in case you
post more, otherwise i'll follow those links and your directions and
hope
On Dec 9, 6:53 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I'm converting to the excellent mod_wsgi and wondering if it's
> possible to make a single httpd virtual host/wsgi file to manage
> wildcard subdomains.
>
> Basically I have an app where i'm creating a new instance for each
12 matches
Mail list logo
