Yes (and sorry for getting your name wrong before, Brett).
str(self.document) works.
On Jan 4, 6:26 pm, Brett Epps wrote:
> Oh, I think the problem is in the __unicode__() method of your Quiz8
> model. You're returning self.document, which is a Document8 object and
> not a unicode string. Try r
i did this in the WSGI file :
import os
import sys
os.environ['DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE'] = 'mysite.settings'
import django.core.handlers.wsgi
application = django.core.handlers.wsgi.WSGIHandler()
and i added the path for my website and when i did syncdb it created
my tables but i cant access the
Oh, I think the problem is in the __unicode__() method of your Quiz8
model. You're returning self.document, which is a Document8 object and
not a unicode string. Try returning unicode(self.document) or something
like '%d' % document.id.
Brett
On 1/4/12 5:07 PM, "Andy Oram" wrote:
>Thanks, Bi
Thanks, Bill. I apologize for not including DEBUG output. Here is what
seems relevant. It looks like the ForeignKey relationship filled in
fields
with the id's of the document and document version (which is what
one would expect) and there was a problem converting it to a string.
Request Me
Hi Andy,
Could you send us a traceback from the 500 error page? (If you don't see
one, you need to set DEBUG = True in settings.py.)
Brett
On 1/4/12 8:29 AM, "Andy Oram" wrote:
>I am pasting in a pretty basic models.py here. It is fairly classic (I
>actually started with Poll tutorial exampl
Your WSGI must be having a DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE specified did you make
sure that the database specified in that setting file was the one in use
when you did your syncdb?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To view this discussion
If you're running the "testserver" it's not using the database, you'll want
to try "runserver" instead.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this
There's no way you can check if the password is correct by querying
the db.
What you can do is try changing the pass thru user.set_password('some-
pass') and see if the login will work.
--
Gladys
http://blog.bixly.com
On Apr 13, 10:44 pm, bruno desthuilliers
wrote:
> Beware of non-printable ch
Beware of non-printable characters when copy-pasting the password ;)
More seriously: this is the only reason I can think of that would
explain your problem :-/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to
On Apr 3, 11:58 pm, Karen Tracey wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:35 PM, xiao_haozi wrote:
> > I'm running into some perplexing regex issues in urls.py and getting
> > to my admin section.
> > It worked before but now that I have another view added in, anything
> > beyond the index regex is g
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:35 PM, xiao_haozi wrote:
> I'm running into some perplexing regex issues in urls.py and getting
> to my admin section.
> It worked before but now that I have another view added in, anything
> beyond the index regex is getting fed into the "url/" section rather
> than adm
Tnx for quick help!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options,
On Feb 11, 6:53 pm, vnv wrote:
> Hi,
>
> could anyone say is there easy way to have select box for integer
> values.
>
> I model I have group field which identifies specific group by integer
> value inside.
> If it's possible I would like to have select box inside admin
> interface for this so use
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:53 PM, vnv wrote:
> Hi,
>
> could anyone say is there easy way to have select box for integer
> values.
>
> I model I have group field which identifies specific group by integer
> value inside.
> If it's possible I would like to have select box inside admin
> interface fo
ALMOST CORRRECT : WITHOUT THE QUOTES !
(r'^admin/', include('admin.site.urls')), --> (r'^admin/',
include(admin.site.urls)),
I was trying too hard!
--
E
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Emmanuel Mayssat wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I followed http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/intro/tutorial02
Thanks a lot, =)
On 20 Ağustos, 14:37, Steve Holden wrote:
> On 8/20/2010 4:22 AM, emre can karabacak wrote:> I'm new to django, and
> apparently django automatically adds an 's' to
> > the ends of category titles i.e. Groups,Users, etc. but I have
> > 'category' and other titles that end with a
On 8/20/2010 4:22 AM, emre can karabacak wrote:
> I'm new to django, and apparently django automatically adds an 's' to
> the ends of category titles i.e. Groups,Users, etc. but I have
> 'category' and other titles that end with a 'y'. so django turns these
> into Categorys, etc. how can I fix this
thank you very much, it was the same problem.
Valérie.
On 2 août, 13:27, Karen Tracey wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 4:02 AM, galbourn wrote:
> > Hello,
>
> > In version 1.2.1, on the admin interface on the form change_list.html,
> > there is no check box above to select all records.
> > In ad
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 4:02 AM, galbourn wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In version 1.2.1, on the admin interface on the form change_list.html,
> there is no check box above to select all records.
> In addition, when you select a record, it does not change color
> (yellow) as in version 1.1.1.
>
>
Similar be
Thank you! Solved.
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Jeff Green wrote:
> You need to also state that null=True. Also, you want to have ensure that
> the field defined in your db
> allows null values.
>
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jonathan Hayward <
> christos.jonathan.hayw...@gmail.com> wr
You need to also state that null=True. Also, you want to have ensure that
the field defined in your db
allows null values.
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jonathan Hayward <
christos.jonathan.hayw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have a model with two foreign keys to itself:
>
> department = models.
On Jan 26, 10:00 am, Jeff Green wrote:
> I found out what my problem was.
> It seems that in my urls.py I recently changed
> admin.site.root to admin.site.urls which has been deprecated.
> Once I changed it back to admin.site.root the admin interface was working in
> oracle
>
> Is it possible that
I found out what my problem was.
It seems that in my urls.py I recently changed
admin.site.root to admin.site.urls which has been deprecated.
Once I changed it back to admin.site.root the admin interface was working in
oracle
Is it possible that the code for oracle is still referencing admin.site.
Maybe I'm getting closer, maybe not. What I did was create a bunch of
different subclasses of ServiceRequest, then created a bunch of
inlines within the admin interface for each type. The admin user has
to be smart enough to pick the right kind on their own, but that's OK.
I did it like this:
#
Yes, you were right. I copied some of the code from my other project,
which was writen with Django 1.0 and my URL contained .* in the end.
Thank you for your help.
On Oct 26, 10:02 pm, Mikhail Korobov wrote:
> It is very likely that your urls.py is wrong. Re-check if admin urls
> are included e
It is very likely that your urls.py is wrong. Re-check if admin urls
are included exactly as in documentation example: "(r'^admin/', include
(admin.site.urls))", without any wildcards.
On 27 окт, 00:12, "M." wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've installed the Admin interface, but the interface is unresponsive.
Yeah that was the problem, I overrode the TEMPLATE_CONTEXT_PROCESSORS
setting in settings.py which got rid of
django.core.context_processors.auth
On Sep 23, 9:56 pm, Karen Tracey wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Nakedsteve wrote:
>
> > Hey everyone, while playing around with an idea th
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Nakedsteve wrote:
>
> Hey everyone, while playing around with an idea that I'm coding with
> Django, I tried to login to the admin interface and after successfully
> logging in, I got this error:
>
> Environment:
>
> Request Method: GET
> Request URL: http://local
I came across this error today, and couldn't find any answers about
this anywhere on the web.
I'm hoping other people will come across this here, and figure out
what it took me some time to realize:
There is a problem in your urls.py file. Atleast there was definitely
a problem with my urls in m
Thank you guys for your reply .. Actually i am using django+satchmo (sorry
for not mentioning that.. my bad).. I thought admin interface related stuffs
are related to Django only.. Thats why i didn't mentioned satchmo...
In satchmo there is a patch for my particular problem explicitly ..
http://w
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Skylar Saveland
wrote:
>
> Is this something having to do with pools?
> >
>
Django doesn't pool connections, so unless the original poster is using an
external pool, no.
Alex
--
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to
say it."
Is this something having to do with pools?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send
its a local process
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Joshua Partogi wrote:
>
> Is this a local process or remote process ?
>
> On May 20, 10:36 pm, Binseer wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > My admin interface is running dead slow.. I am using postgresql8.3.
> > When i checked running processes by "ps ax |
Is this a local process or remote process ?
On May 20, 10:36 pm, Binseer wrote:
> Hi all,
> My admin interface is running dead slow.. I am using postgresql8.3.
> When i checked running processes by "ps ax | grep "postgres" ", it
> shows some idle processes are running in the very begining itself
You need to give your ChangeLog model a __unicode__ method, then
you'll get titles that make sense.
On Mar 30, 12:45 pm, Phil Edwards wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> First off, apologies if this message ends up appearing twice - I had a
> minor problem getting Google to recognise that I'd subscribed...
>
>
Phil Edwards wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> First off, apologies if this message ends up appearing twice - I had a
> minor problem getting Google to recognise that I'd subscribed...
>
Somehow, I just *knew* that was going to happen... :-)
--
Regards
Phil Edwards | PGP/GnuPG Key Id
Brighton, UK
Don't forget to add a __unicode__ method to your models.
//Thomas
2008/11/29 mobil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> How to make the admin interface display a list of table columns
> instead of just a Users object
>
> Select users to change
>
>* Add users
>
> Users
> Users object
> Users object
> Users
On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 18:30 -0800, mobil wrote:
> How to make the admin interface display a list of table columns
> instead of just a Users object
This is covered in the first two parts of the tutorial. Or you can go
directly the admin documentation. The appropriate setting is
list_display:
htt
I figured out the problem. I used inspectdb to import my models from
an existing database. I then marked the primary_key fields with
primary_key=True, but I didn't should have also converted them from
IntegerField to AutoField. Once I did that everything worked fine. I
hope this message saves some
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Saravana Kumar K, Bangalore <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>I was trying to install Autotest tool, which is used for kernel testing.
> It uses the Django also, Please find the link below
>
>http://autotest.kernel.org/wiki/AutotestServerInstall
>
You left off the actual exception you get. Also, the details of your Model
and ModelAdmin definitions would be helpful (please post to dpaste.com and
point to them if they're big enough to display poorly in email), since I've
used this method myself without error so I suspect there is something
sp
Although Data Browser is interesting. I was hoping for something much
closer to the admin interface, but for viewing and searching. It would
seem like DRY would suggest that using the admin interface for read-
only access would actually be the right way to do this, simply making
someone staff, and
I just found this:
http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/databrowse/
but other input is welcome.
Thanks,
Sean
On Oct 29, 9:43 am, Sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I add a staff user with no additional permission to my admin
> interface, hoping that they would be able to use the interfac
Hi,
There are backwards incompatible changes between 0.96 and 1.0 for admin.
A good source (plus screencast) is available at:
http://oebfare.com/blog/2008/jul/20/newforms-admin-migration-and-screencast/
It also has links back to the main doco.
Ray Smith
http://RaymondSmith.com
[EMAIL PROTEC
On Jul 8, 2:40 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 06:22 -0700, Stuart Grimshaw wrote:
> > I'm getting this error when trying to view my admin interface ...
>
> > In template /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/django/contrib/admin/
> > templates/admin/base.html,
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 06:22 -0700, Stuart Grimshaw wrote:
> I'm getting this error when trying to view my admin interface ...
>
> In template /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/django/contrib/admin/
> templates/admin/base.html, error at line 28
> Caught an exception while rendering: Tried showSide
Not having the book yet (it's in the mail) I'm not sure exactly what
is on page 84, so I'll make a couple of suggestions/observations.
The "No such table" error message means exactly what it says, so this
really feels like "python manage.py syncdb" wasn't run (or wasn't run
successfully).
In add
this one solved it:
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users/browse_thread/thread/ed22e4efc279d68d/d72a2e2f79156e01
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send
On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 16:51 -0800, sime wrote:
> Now I expect this again is going to be defended religiously; but the
> fact that 500's don't run context processors, to me, serves as a nice
> little reminder that {% media_url %} or similar needs to be a core
> template tag. Where is the sense in
Now I expect this again is going to be defended religiously; but the
fact that 500's don't run context processors, to me, serves as a nice
little reminder that {% media_url %} or similar needs to be a core
template tag. Where is the sense in bothering with a custom 500 if you
can't conveniently us
On Nov 9, 2007 2:40 PM, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you want to specify a different handler for 500s, that's up to you,
> but be prepared for the inevitable complete breaking of your site when
> something running inside it raises another exception.
I think I'll settle for hardco
On Nov 9, 2007 1:29 PM, Brot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> does this mean, that there is no solution for this problem or is there
> a smart workaround?
This means there is absolutely nothing in Django which will, in the
server error view, attempt to run your context processors. There is
not a swit
does this mean, that there is no solution for this problem or is there
a smart workaround?
I think I could use a custom templatetag. But this would violate DRY.
Regards
Bernd
On Nov 9, 7:49 pm, "Marty Alchin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 9, 2007 12:34 PM, Brot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
On Nov 9, 2007 12:49 PM, Marty Alchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I seem to remember something a while back about 500 not processing too
> much, to reduce the possibility of getting into a recursive loop of
> exceptions. I can't seem to find that now, but that could be what
> we're running into.
On Nov 9, 2007 12:34 PM, Brot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have defined a 500.html template in my root template directory.
> This template "extends" from my base.html template. In the base
> template I have something like:
>
>
> But if there is an 500 error in the admin interface, it seems th
Either override templates for specific models or use javascript (js
property of the Admin class) to change the fields.
I think that it will be also possible to change the field type with
the newforms admin. Reference:
http://www.djangosnippets.org/snippets/35/
Good luck!
Aidas Bendoraitis [aka Ar
I had the same issue in the past.
There's a bug in the django code and a ticket was already scheduled.
Before 0.96, that by the way seems to improve a lot the admin class
providing more hooks to customize It, you can add a row in your Admin
class code that says:
manager=myCustomManager()
Hope I
On 10/15/06, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The value of Users.icon either has to be a valid primary key value in
> the table for the Icon model or NULL (of you have null=True in the
> ForeignKey constructor). This is because a Django ForeignKey field is a
> true foreign key in t
On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 04:47 -0700, Ewout ter Haar wrote:
> I am trying to make use of the django admin, to use with a database
> which is normally managed by another (PHP) application. I ran
> inspectdb, and after tweaking the models a little bit, it works for
> basic fields like InterFields, Char
I'm not familiar with how ForeignKey fields interact with the database,
but I wondered if you could have an instance of the Icon model that
represented no icon (-1). Otherwise, I think you might need to override
the model methods (probably the save() method), but that's just a guess.
--~--~-
+1 on this suggestion. If I remember correctly, there's a ticket about
this issue.
Along this line, it might be nice to provide the same functionality for
the "recent actions" list, for example as a tooltip.
gjiro
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
+1 on this suggestion. If I remember correctly, there's a ticket about
this issue.
Along this line, it might be nice to provide the same functionality for
the "recent actions" list, for example as a tooltip.
gjiro
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
+1 on this suggestion. If I remember correctly, there's a ticket about
this issue.
Along this line, it might be nice to provide the same functionality for
the "recent actions" list, for example as a tooltip.
gjiro
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
On 10/11/06, patrickk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> when assigning permissions, there´s a list of installed apps/models,
> like:
> posting | can add posting
> posting | can change posting
> ...
>
> the problem is, if I have several models with the same name (e.g.
> category) within different apps
On 8/9/06, Bryan Chow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In particular, take a look at "Admin converted to separate templates"
> near the bottom.
I think Kenneth was referring more to the relative difficulty of
adding some types of new functionality to the admin; re-"skinning" it,
or building up custom
This is really good news. Thank you to all those involved.
The Django admin interface might not be suitable for many custom Web sites,
but it does fit the bill for some traditional I.T. apps.
Really neat stuff - very DRY.
On Thursday 10 August 2006 15:11, Bryan Chow wrote:
> ...
> I disagre
On 8/9/06, a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i like the admin interface and want to modify it for my needs, do you
> have pointers on how to go about it
On 8/9/06, Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> apart from cosmetic stuff which is explained in the relevant doc, it
> is easier to roll
On 10-Aug-06, at 4:17 AM, a wrote:
> i like the admin interface and want to modify it for my needs, do you
> have pointers on how to go about it
apart from cosmetic stuff which is explained in the relevant doc, it
is easier to roll your own than to modify the admin interface
--
regards
kg
Not that I could find -- I believe I originally found it in a Ticket somewhere.
John.
On 8/8/06, ak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> John, app_label made it work. Thanks !!!
>
> P.S. Is there a line in django docs about that ?
>
>
> >
>
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~---
John, app_label made it work. Thanks !!!
P.S. Is there a line in django docs about that ?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@goog
Hi Anton,
You may need to add the Meta class in too:
mycompany/models.py:
from django.db import models
class Subnet(models.Model):
field = models.CharField(maxlength=255)
...
class Admin:
pass
class Meta:
app_label = 'administration'
And then in your mycompany/
Malcolm, my models are imported into application,models and do have
Admin inner class. Take a look:
1. Model:
$ cat subnet.py
# -*- coding: windows-1251 -*-
from django.db import models
class Subnet(models.Model):
address = models.IPAddressField()
mask = models.IPAddressField()
clas
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 00:37 -0700, ak wrote:
> Hello guys
>
> Today I discovered a strange problem which may be caused by my
> misunderstanding or by a bug in django and i would like to shed some
> light on it with your help.
I think you are misunderstanding how the admin application interacts
w
Forgot: In the trunk the problem also exists.
2006/3/30, Daniel Bimschas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If have a model like this:
>
> class Article(meta.Model):
> cite_key = meta.CharField(maxlength=255, primary_key=True)
> ...
>
> where "cite_key" is a unique string used in a bibt
If have a model like this:
class Article(meta.Model):
cite_key = meta.CharField(maxlength=255, primary_key=True)
...
where "cite_key" is a unique string used in a bibtex-file. The problem
now are the links to the edit pages created by the admin interface.
The html-code is fo
On 3/30/06, Daniel Bimschas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi there!
>
> I'm currently trying to convert an old webapp written in PHP into a
> django-based app. The PHP-System used VARCHAR-Fields as primary keys
> in the MySQL - DB.
>
> Now, if i convert the data for the new tables created by Djan
Sorry for the spam all, I should've check the bug tracker (#930) first...
James S. Martin, RHCE
Contractor
Administrative Office of the United States Courts
Washington, DC
(202) 502-2394
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscr
django-users@googlegroups.com wrote on 02/09/2006 07:20:35 PM:
> So this is a strange problem...I'm getting the Following error when try
to
> view the list mode of my court_detals object in the Admin interface.
>
snip.
To be a little less verbose, I think the SQL handler in django is not
ha
You can get started here:
http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/CookBookAdminTools
On 1/22/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> how i could change in the amin interface the example.com to be my
> site.com
>
> Thanks for all people that are helping me
http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/tutorial2/#customize-the-admin-look-and-feel
Bryan
OK, generic views is the way. Thanks!
Emanuele
This is _really_ interesting. I hope concrete planning on this in
future.
+1
Cheers,
Emanuele
Emanuele wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to give read-only access to some objects in admin interface to
> selected users. I know that django admin interface is CRUD and I can
> give only create/update/delete permissions to users, but is there a way
> to solve my problem (other than creating my templates a
On 12/27/05, Emanuele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to give read-only access to some objects in admin interface to
> selected users. I know that django admin interface is CRUD and I can
> give only create/update/delete permissions to users, but is there a way
> to solve my problem (other t
Patrik K says:
> just being curious: what´s the argument against defining the rows in the
model?
Hi Patrick,
I think it would be better use of display design if you kept the rows
out of the model. You can achieve as much as you are asking by using
css.
For example, if you do the following:
1) Cre
just being curious: what´s the argument against defining the rows in the
model?
using id´s works fine with a few tables, but with hundreds of tables it´s
getting complicated: because "body" in "films" may be a large textarea
whereas "body" in "comments" may be a smaller one. ok, one could use
"fi
You can use ID's: "id_summary", "id_body", and so on.
#id_summary {
width: 100%;
height: 5em;
}
#id_body {
width: 100%;
height: 10em;
}
Thanks,
Eugene
"patrick k" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
as far as i know, textares have classes like "vLarg
as far as i know, textares have classes like "vLargeTextField". so, i don´t
know how one can change that.
by the way, with doing what you suggested you have to update the .css-file
everytime you add (or change) a model.
patrick
>
> On 12/27/05 18:28, patrick k wrote:
>>> On 12/27/05, patrick k
On 12/27/05 18:28, patrick k wrote:
On 12/27/05, patrick k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- how do i change the numrows for a textarea-field?
You can do this with CSS; create custom admin templates that include
some custom CSS code.
what i meant was changing the numrows for each textarea-field
> On 12/27/05, patrick k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> - how do i change the numrows for a textarea-field?
>
> You can do this with CSS; create custom admin templates that include
> some custom CSS code.
what i meant was changing the numrows for each textarea-field seperately.
e.g., a body-field
Adrian Holovaty wrote:
>
>
>>- we have automatic fields for createdate and updatedate (auto_now,
>>auto_now_add). what about automatically inserting the logged in user who
>>creates (or updates) the record? i don´t know about anybody else, but i need
>>that all the time. that´s especially intere
On 12/27/05, patrick k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - how do i change the numrows for a textarea-field?
You can do this with CSS; create custom admin templates that include
some custom CSS code.
> - why is it always the first column of the list which is linked to the
> detail-page? when listing
Thanks for looking into it. I've added the ordering to the Job table,
and that seems to fix it when I'm sorting by "Job". However, I'm still
only getting 1 record being displayed when it says there are 11 (and I
know there are that many in the database).
Let me know what other information you nee
On 9/4/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For some reason, even though there are 11 records in the database for
> this table the admin interface is only showing me one of them.
> Underneath that one entry is message text saying "11 schedules", so I
> know the DB API is finding them
94 matches
Mail list logo
