Filip,
Thanks for your very informative explanations and ideas. I will be
studying it closely.
Thanks,
Michael
Filip Wasilewski wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Jan 30, 6:25 pm, Michael Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> James Bennett wrote:
>>> On Jan 30, 2008 9:18 AM, Michael Hipp <[EMAIL PROTEC
Hi Michael,
On Jan 30, 6:25 pm, Michael Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Bennett wrote:
> > On Jan 30, 2008 9:18 AM, Michael Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Does Django have any built-in way to handle or prevent simultaneous,
> >> incompatible edits to a database record?
>
> > No, tha
Thomas Guettler wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 30. Januar 2008 16:18 schrieb Michael Hipp:
>> Does Django have any built-in way to handle or prevent simultaneous,
>> incompatible edits to a database record?
>
>
> Some days ago there was a thread about optimistic locking:
> I wrote an second answer some m
Am Mittwoch, 30. Januar 2008 16:18 schrieb Michael Hipp:
> Does Django have any built-in way to handle or prevent simultaneous,
> incompatible edits to a database record?
Some days ago there was a thread about optimistic locking:
I wrote an second answer some minutes ago.
http://groups.google.c
I've seen this in some Wiki code before, and surprisingly Joomla!
Add a checked_out flag, which is a boolean field in the table. When a
user opens the entry, you could possibly use a post_view signal to set
the object as checked_out, so when someone else opens it, it tells the
user that someone
James Bennett wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2008 9:18 AM, Michael Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Does Django have any built-in way to handle or prevent simultaneous,
>> incompatible edits to a database record?
>
> No, that's what your database's concurrency handling is for.
Ok, I probably didn't expla
On Jan 30, 2008 9:18 AM, Michael Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does Django have any built-in way to handle or prevent simultaneous,
> incompatible edits to a database record?
No, that's what your database's concurrency handling is for.
--
"Bureaucrat Conrad, you are technically correct --
7 matches
Mail list logo