Thanks Cal. If you do get the time that'd be fab, positive criticism is
always useful. Equally please don't feel obligated - sure you weren't
expecting to have to give a blow-by-blow breakdown of pain points you
found. :p
May be worth taking any further convo over to the django-rest-framework
Hi Tom,
Apologies for the slow answer, give me a week or so and I'll spend some
time putting a proper detailed reply/breakdown together in a new thread.
Cal
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Tom Christie
wrote:
>
> Hi Cal,
>
> > DRF has it's own problems and (again imho) does not solve the prob
Hi Cal,
> DRF has it's own problems and (again imho) does not solve the problems it
was originally designed to fix. Attempting to build anything beyond "out of
the box CRUD" requires hacky/unclean workarounds, with most of your time
spent fighting against the shortcomings of DRF rather than wor
Hi Cal,
Thanks. I'm always looking for more pain points about Django that could be
improved.
Collin
On Friday, December 12, 2014 1:05:02 PM UTC-5, Cal Leeming wrote:
>
> Hi Collin,
>
> Just a few comments;
>
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Collin Anderson > wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Re: the h
Hi Collin,
Just a few comments;
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Collin Anderson
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Re: the hacker news thread, (sorry for getting a little off topic,) I just
> wanted to mention a few places where we've tried to improve some of those
> things recently:
> - The ORM is still slow,
On 12/12/2014 10:42 AM, Collin Anderson wrote:
> Re: the hacker news thread, (sorry for getting a little off topic,) I just
> wanted to mention a few places where we've tried to improve some of those
> things recently:
> - The ORM is still slow, but we've added prefetch_related() and improved
>
Hi,
Re: the hacker news thread, (sorry for getting a little off topic,) I just
wanted to mention a few places where we've tried to improve some of those
things recently:
- The ORM is still slow, but we've added prefetch_related() and improved
select_related() which allows you do use fewer queri
If you're using Django, then there isn't really an alternative, as it's
really a key selling point of Django.
Some people recommend SQLAlchemy, but I dislike that even more for it's
over-engineered complexity.
Peewee [1] shows some good potential, but I haven't tried it for myself yet.
As for wh
Can you please advise why actually you hate Django ORM and what should be
considered instead of it?
суббота, 6 декабря 2014 г., 23:18:06 UTC+2 пользователь Cal Leeming написал:
>
> Hi Artie,
>
> First, I would strongly recommend reading some of the work by David Mytton
> at Server Density, he an
I would like to thank you a lot for so detailed answers, actually I didn't
expect to get so much information on my question.
That really great and inspiring. So thank you very much again.
Guess now I need to start learning PostgreSQL, cause that is not first time
when I hear that Python and Post
Django ORM is the best thing since sliced bread!
On 07/12/2014 8:17 am, "Cal Leeming" wrote:
> Hi Artie,
>
> First, I would strongly recommend reading some of the work by David Mytton
> at Server Density, he and his team have been using MongoDB extensively for
> many years and they have shared a
Hi Artie,
First, I would strongly recommend reading some of the work by David Mytton
at Server Density, he and his team have been using MongoDB extensively for
many years and they have shared a lot of their insight [1]. It's also worth
mentioning that Postgres has support for JSON field type [2] w
Hi,
What do you mean by "parsing with updating of products"?
I'd personally store everything in authoritatively in that 1 generalized
table and get rid of the 10 smaller tables. Have a "manufacturer" CharField
or ForeignKey to determine what fields are available and other custom
logic. As you
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Artie wrote:
> Good day, Community,
>
> I'm looking for advise on MySQL & MongoDB usage so please let me take your
> time to describe the situation.
>
> I came to work on e-commerce shop of electrical components with about 10
> millions of products. Now all of it s
14 matches
Mail list logo
