akonsu wrote:
> yes, it is an innovative feature. i think it is difficult to implement
> right. the general problem in my understanding is to be able to
> generate a regex that accepts a (partial) input string. then, to
> compare the generated regex with the list in the urls module. this
> involve
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 11:07 +0200, Olivier Guilyardi wrote:
>> Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
>>
This seems to mean that the resolver and the reverse resolver are not
symmetrical. Is this a bug?
>>> It is. There's a sort of correct patch to fix a few things like th
yes, it is an innovative feature. i think it is difficult to implement
right. the general problem in my understanding is to be able to
generate a regex that accepts a (partial) input string. then, to
compare the generated regex with the list in the urls module. this
involves programming language t
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 11:07 +0200, Olivier Guilyardi wrote:
> Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
>
> >> This seems to mean that the resolver and the reverse resolver are not
> >> symmetrical. Is this a bug?
> >
> > It is. There's a sort of correct patch to fix a few things like this in
> > Trac, so we'll
akonsu wrote:
> i would say that yes it is a bug. i have seen many bugs in the reverse
> resolver code. for example, it crashes (throws a python exception) if
> a regex pattern contains question marks (optional elements) and i am
> sure it has a lot more. my personal opinoin is that this code is
>
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
>> This seems to mean that the resolver and the reverse resolver are not
>> symmetrical. Is this a bug?
>
> It is. There's a sort of correct patch to fix a few things like this in
> Trac, so we'll get to checking it in at some point.
Should I post a ticket?
Regards,
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 19:00 +0200, Olivier Guilyardi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In my urls.py I have the following entry:
>
> url(r'^items/download/(?P[0-9A-Za-z._:%?-]+)\.(?P[0-9a-z]+)$',
> web_view.item_export,
> name="telemeta-item-export"),
>
> In my template:
> {% url telemeta-item-e
hello,
i would say that yes it is a bug. i have seen many bugs in the reverse
resolver code. for example, it crashes (throws a python exception) if
a regex pattern contains question marks (optional elements) and i am
sure it has a lot more. my personal opinoin is that this code is
simply a hack.
8 matches
Mail list logo
