Re: Per-object permissions

http://github.com/initcrash/django-object-permissions/ implements this on 1.1 (it's not hard at all, so i don't really understand the change planed for 1.2) there are no docs yet, but the testproject shows how to use it: just use ObjectPermissionAdmin as base for the admin classes instead of ModelA

Re: Per-object permissions

2009/11/25 Gamliel Roi : > Any idea when 1.2 will be released? > > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 3:31 PM, rebus_ wrote: >> >> 2009/11/25 Russell Keith-Magee : >> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:16 PM, rebus_ wrote: >> >> 2009/11/24 nek4life : >> >>> You should look into django-authority.  I'm pretty s

Re: Per-object permissions

Any idea when 1.2 will be released? On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 3:31 PM, rebus_ wrote: > 2009/11/25 Russell Keith-Magee : > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:16 PM, rebus_ wrote: > >> 2009/11/24 nek4life : > >>> You should look into django-authority. I'm pretty sure that has per- > >>> object-permiss

Re: Per-object permissions

2009/11/25 Russell Keith-Magee : > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:16 PM, rebus_ wrote: >> 2009/11/24 nek4life : >>> You should look into django-authority.  I'm pretty sure that has per- >>> object-permissions. >>> >>> http://packages.python.org/django-authority/index.html >>> >>> On Nov 24, 7:00 am, g

Re: Per-object permissions

On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:16 PM, rebus_ wrote: > 2009/11/24 nek4life : >> You should look into django-authority.  I'm pretty sure that has per- >> object-permissions. >> >> http://packages.python.org/django-authority/index.html >> >> On Nov 24, 7:00 am, gamliel roi wrote: >>> Hello all, >>> >>>

Re: Per-object permissions

gamliel roi wrote: > Hello all, > > I have the admin site up and running but I need to create a group of users, > such that each of the users will be able to edit objects that are only > relevant to them (e.g Project objects that the user is also the > ProjectManager). > > I know that in the past

Re: Per-object permissions

2009/11/24 nek4life : > You should look into django-authority.  I'm pretty sure that has per- > object-permissions. > > http://packages.python.org/django-authority/index.html > > On Nov 24, 7:00 am, gamliel roi wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> I have the admin site up and running but I need to create a

Re: Per-object permissions

You should look into django-authority. I'm pretty sure that has per- object-permissions. http://packages.python.org/django-authority/index.html On Nov 24, 7:00 am, gamliel roi wrote: > Hello all, > > I have the admin site up and running but I need to create a group of users, > such that each of

Re: Per-object permissions

Most promising solution I've seen is django-authority. I haven't (yet) used it but I'm planning to do that at some point. Quick peek revealed that branch you mentioned is a quite outdated, last update is "only" two and half years old.. On Tue, 2009

Re: per object permissions, caching and templates?

Hello, On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Hanne Moa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > AFAIK is_authenticated doesn't enter into it at all. I think I might not have explained very well... Newforms-admin ( i.e. "admin" now :) ) has per-object permissions. These are more programmatic than per-row perm

Re: per object permissions, caching and templates?

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Bram de Jong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For freesound.org I really need per-object permissions and caching. > I would also love to use the {% cache %} template tag as much as > possible because it's so easy and transparent! > Now, say for example I have a sound,

Re: Per object permissions

On 2/8/07, Ramdas S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think Adrian is keeping the trunk upto date. I am using thie updates trunk > right nowand everything seems to be OK Except that the per-object permissions branch hasn't had a trunk merge for over a month. I'd *guess* Adrian is too busy with the n

Re: Per object permissions

I think Adrian is keeping the trunk upto date. I am using thie updates trunk right nowand everything seems to be OK Ramdas S On 2/9/07, Scanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 7, 8:36 pm, "Jay Parlar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Chris Long was the original maintainer, and he kept

Re: Per object permissions

On Feb 7, 8:36 pm, "Jay Parlar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chris Long was the original maintainer, and he kept doing merges for > awhile. At this point though, I haven't seen him around these parts in > months. > > Adrian was doing it for awhile after that, but seems to have stopped. > > I've

Re: Per object permissions

On 2/7/07, Scanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is someone actively merging in stuff from mainline? > I emailed the address listed on the wiki page at djangoproject.com > for the project but either my spam filter ate the response or I have > not gotten any response. Chris Long was the original ma

Re: Per object permissions

On Feb 7, 2:36 pm, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I, for one, am keen to see per-object permissions merged into trunk. > In terms of timelines, it probably won't happen before v1.0, but it is > definitely on the list of things to do. > > However, like all the branches, it req

Re: Per object permissions

On 2/7/07, Edward Muller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What happened to the per object permission branches? Are they going > to be integrated into django? I, for one, am keen to see per-object permissions merged into trunk. In terms of timelines, it probably won't happen before v1.0, but it is d