On Nov 23, 2010, at 9:09 PM, sh...@bogomip.com wrote:
> Since you've noticed it I have to ask.. since I didn't think it would
> be any different.. how does this differ from the current Django
> method?
The standard Django implementation creates an intermediate table with foreign
keys back to the
On Nov 23, 6:42 pm, Christophe Pettus wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2010, at 5:40 PM, sh...@bogomip.com wrote:
>
> > Without test data I'm not sure where the trade offs are with the
> > following. However it should improve the ability to look up items
> > that reference a certain set of keys as well as eas
On Nov 23, 2010, at 5:40 PM, sh...@bogomip.com wrote:
> Without test data I'm not sure where the trade offs are with the
> following. However it should improve the ability to look up items
> that reference a certain set of keys as well as easily check to see if
> a set already exists. This shoul
3 matches
Mail list logo
