On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:21 PM, ojayred wrote:
> Hello Users,
>
> I am new to using Django and so far, I like it. I have installed
> Django and want to use it with a pre-existing database. Several tables
> have multiple primary keys. How do I create the multiple primary keys
> in the model? I di
Leo wrote:
> Lars, have you made any progress on this? I agree that only the
Sorry to say: no progress at all:(
> numeric types are interesting as multiple keys, so worrying about
> URL encoding is pointless (i.e., there's no reason to worry about
> supporting multiple arbitrary-string keys).
Lars, have you made any progress on this? I agree that only the
numeric
types are interesting as multiple keys, so worrying about URL
encoding
is pointless (i.e., there's no reason to worry about supporting
multiple
arbitrary-string keys).
I'm trying to convince a team to use Django for new deve
Thanks, Michael, I'll give it a try.
/Lars
Michael Radziej wrote:
> Hi Lars,
>
> I found myself in a similar position, and I'm also coming from the database
> side ... funny ;-)
>
> I have attached a small patch that solved the problem for me and might be a
> start for you, but be aware, it's m
On 8/14/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Periodically, I wonder if it's worth implementing this anyway, just for
> fun, and then saying if you have multiple primary keys, you can't use
> those models in the admin.
No need to ban _all_ multiple primary key models from admin -
Hi Lars,
I found myself in a similar position, and I'm also coming from the database
side ... funny ;-)
I have attached a small patch that solved the problem for me and might be a
start for you, but be aware, it's more a crutch than a solution.
- this patch won't make it into the project, so you
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 06:51 +0200, Lars Stavholm wrote:
>> Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 08:47 +0800, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>>> [...]
You will have more difficulty with the Admin application and generic
views. Both of these features
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 06:51 +0200, Lars Stavholm wrote:
> Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 08:47 +0800, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> > [...]
> >> You will have more difficulty with the Admin application and generic
> >> views. Both of these features rely upon the ability to inst
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 08:47 +0800, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> [...]
>> You will have more difficulty with the Admin application and generic
>> views. Both of these features rely upon the ability to install URLs
>> like:
>>
>> /path/to/object/42/ -> edit object 42
>>
>
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 08:47 +0800, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
[...]
> You will have more difficulty with the Admin application and generic
> views. Both of these features rely upon the ability to install URLs
> like:
>
> /path/to/object/42/ -> edit object 42
>
> This works fine if you have a sin
On 8/14/07, Lars Stavholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> first of all: django rocks! I'm a database application developer
Glad you like it! Welcome to the community.
> I know that this has been discussed on this list, but what I would
> like to know now is: is there any effort going
11 matches
Mail list logo
