Re: Models and access to one-to-many

2006-01-14 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On Saturday 14 Jan 2006 7:01 pm, ChaosKCW wrote: > reporter =  article.get_reporter() > > Is there some reason this isnt dont automactically for you on as > follows on attr access: > >  reporter = article.reporter that is the id which is stored - take a look at the table structure created in the

Re: Models and access to one-to-many

2006-01-14 Thread ChaosKCW
Mostly I agree with that statement. If you going to use the attribute, then you need to use it. You have to take a hit at some point. I rember using a world class ORM tool in jaav that allowed join fetches for first elvel attributes for perfroamnce. While I dont expect that of this api for some

Re: Models and access to one-to-many

2006-01-14 Thread Marcos Sánchez Provencio
That smells too much of premature optimisation ;-) If you know your model slightly, you know when a database hit happens (and it might be unavoidable anyway, so why worry?). El sáb, 14-01-2006 a las 13:51 +, Luke Plant escribió: > One reason for the way it is at the moment is it's easy to see

Re: Models and access to one-to-many

2006-01-14 Thread ChaosKCW
Thanks, Luke Plant wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:31:52 - ChaosKCW wrote: > > > In the Reporter/Article example on the Django site, to get the > > reporter of an article requires you to call the a method: > > > > reporter = article.get_reporter() > > > > Is there some reason this isnt don

Re: Models and access to one-to-many

2006-01-14 Thread Luke Plant
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:31:52 - ChaosKCW wrote: > In the Reporter/Article example on the Django site, to get the > reporter of an article requires you to call the a method: > > reporter = article.get_reporter() > > Is there some reason this isnt dont automactically for you on as > follows