Re: Modeling Question on Many-to-Many(with through) and Proxy models

2012-04-22 Thread Arruda
So using your tip, I've done this: class Foo1Bar(FooBar): > > objects = TypeAwareManager('foo__type',1) > > class Meta: > proxy= True > > def change_fb(cls): > old_foo = cls.foo > > @property > def new_foo(self): > return Foo1(self.old_fo

Re: Modeling Question on Many-to-Many(with through) and Proxy models

2012-04-22 Thread Arruda
Thanks, I saw that .model thing too, but was also unsure about it... I might just test it. Em sábado, 21 de abril de 2012 19h04min30s UTC-3, akaariai escreveu: > > On Apr 21, 8:35 pm, Arruda wrote: > > Should I create this many-to-many table as a normal model(no proxy) and > set > > the foo f

Re: Modeling Question on Many-to-Many(with through) and Proxy models

2012-04-21 Thread akaariai
On Apr 21, 8:35 pm, Arruda wrote: > Should I create this many-to-many table as a normal model(no proxy) and set > the foo foreingkey to Foo1 instead of Foo? > Or should I use only FooBar as many-to-many and create some specific > queries that would convert ALL the returned foo objects as Foo1 inst