Hi, and thanks - I switched my "image caption" field to be the "core"
field and this was the change that worked.
Also, any idea why the ImageField widget doesn't show the image, just
the path to the image file, and a link that goes nowhere...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~
I've had similar problems with using an image field as the core field
in an edit_inline relationship. When an object with an edit_inline
relationship is saved, the admin checks if the core fields on any of
th erelated objects are blank, and if so, it deletes that related
object. aWhat happens when
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 07:35:46AM -0800, sparkydeville wrote:
> To clarify the use-case, consider an article like an image gallery,
> wherein one article can have more than one image associated with it.
> Further it would be helpful if the Article add/edit form could allow
> users to add images w
> Also, the full path to the upload directory *works* even if a relative
> path to the media folder would be better - I don't want to spend time
> fix things that aren't broken until the "showstoppers" are addressed.
works in admin - but fix it now because it aint gonna work in your templates
Thank you Ivan, Law and Malcolm for the fast, and helpful replies...
problems persist.
I fixed the syntax error in the __repr__ of the Article class, and
while I'm no longer getting "Django blowup errors", there are other
bugs to contend with.
Also, the full path to the upload directory *works*
On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 01:30 -0800, sparkydeville wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'm new to Django, and I'm seeing various complaints about the
> ImageField, specifically it's basic inability to work as advertised. I
> think I've tried every permutation of trying to make it accomplish the
> simple task of wo
> image_caption = meta.CharField(maxlength=256, blank=True)
> the_image =
> meta.ImageField(upload_to='/home/sparky/django_instances/gbtt/media/editorial_u\
> ploads/', core=True)
give a relative path for upload_to - what is the error message?
--~--~-~--~~~
sparkydeville wrote:
>I'm new to Django, and I'm seeing various complaints about the
>ImageField, specifically it's basic inability to work as advertised.
>
Could you, please, clarify what exactly doesn't work in regard to image
fields? My experience is that they are succesfully storing and shoi
8 matches
Mail list logo
