On 6/29/06, Mikko Nylén <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hand writing the SQL might work, though, I would need to
hand-write the whole query, including other filters, and turn the results
manually as Color objects. How exactly would "where/tables clauses in a filter"
you mentioned work?The full detail
From:
django-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Russell Keith-Magee
Sent: 29. kesäkuuta 2006 5:22
To: django-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Exclusion by a many-to-many field to self
On
6/28/06, Mikko Nylén <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
I've
Ivan Sagalaev wrote:
> This change might lead to some well hidden bugs. If someone was
> deliberately using the behavior of join that doesn't get records that
> don't have their related counterparts then those queries would suddenly
> yield much more results than they used to.
To clarify... I
On 6/29/06, Ivan Sagalaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Russell Keith-Magee wrote:> Interesting... this could be interpreted as a bug in exclude(). It might> be worth checking to see if this has been identified before, and if not,> raising this as a bug. Sounds like it could be a problem with a join
>
Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> Interesting... this could be interpreted as a bug in exclude(). It might
> be worth checking to see if this has been identified before, and if not,
> raising this as a bug. Sounds like it could be a problem with a join
> that should be OUTER, but is LEFT INNER (or s
On 6/28/06, Mikko Nylén <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
I've tried this:Color.objects.exclude(similar_colors__the_color__startswith="..."), and italmost works. However, the problem is, it doesn't give the Colors whichdon't have any Colors in similar_colors. I need to get these as well.
Interesting...
6 matches
Mail list logo
