On 12 nov, 00:06, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:09 AM, hcarvalhoalves
>
>
>
>
>
> wrote:
> > To be fair, I only had one small pet peeve with the current views API
> > after trying the alpha: the use of self.args / self.kwargs.
>
> > There's added value on being able to
On 12 November 2010 03:12, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> 2010/11/12 Łukasz Rekucki :
>> On 12 November 2010 01:45, Ian Lewis wrote:
>>> 2010/11/12 Łukasz Rekucki
On 12 November 2010 01:16, hcarvalhoalves
wrote:
> What about having an official 1.3 feedback thread at django-dev
2010/11/12 Łukasz Rekucki :
> On 12 November 2010 01:45, Ian Lewis wrote:
>> 2010/11/12 Łukasz Rekucki
>>>
>>> On 12 November 2010 01:16, hcarvalhoalves
>>> wrote:
>>> > What about having an official 1.3 feedback thread at django-developers
>>> > list? ;)
>>> >
>>> > I'm liking the pack of small
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:09 AM, hcarvalhoalves
wrote:
> To be fair, I only had one small pet peeve with the current views API
> after trying the alpha: the use of self.args / self.kwargs.
>
> There's added value on being able to see which parameters a view
> expects by seeing it's method signatur
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Steve Holden wrote:
> On 11/11/2010 5:04 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>> It won't be 100% frozen until the final release
>
> Shouldn't that be "first beta"?
Let me clarify:
The absolute hard deadline for changes to API is the final release.
That's the point at
On 11/11/2010 5:04 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> It won't be 100% frozen until the final release
Shouldn't that be "first beta"?
regards
Steve
--
DjangoCon US 2010 September 7-9 http://djangocon.us/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users
On 12 November 2010 01:45, Ian Lewis wrote:
> 2010/11/12 Łukasz Rekucki
>>
>> On 12 November 2010 01:16, hcarvalhoalves
>> wrote:
>> > What about having an official 1.3 feedback thread at django-developers
>> > list? ;)
>> >
>> > I'm liking the pack of small improvements coming in this release,
To be fair, I only had one small pet peeve with the current views API
after trying the alpha: the use of self.args / self.kwargs.
There's added value on being able to see which parameters a view
expects by seeing it's method signature:
def publisher(request, publisher_name):
publisher = get_
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 8:16 AM, hcarvalhoalves
wrote:
> What about having an official 1.3 feedback thread at django-developers
> list? ;)
Why is a single catch-all thread needed? Those sorts of threads
rapidly descend into an unmaintainable mess. It's better to open a new
thread for any issue yo
2010/11/12 Łukasz Rekucki
> On 12 November 2010 01:16, hcarvalhoalves
> wrote:
> > What about having an official 1.3 feedback thread at django-developers
> > list? ;)
> >
> > I'm liking the pack of small improvements coming in this release, and
> > timing is very good, well done. I must say I'm
On 12 November 2010 01:16, hcarvalhoalves wrote:
> What about having an official 1.3 feedback thread at django-developers
> list? ;)
>
> I'm liking the pack of small improvements coming in this release, and
> timing is very good, well done. I must say I'm less than happy with
> the view classes th
What about having an official 1.3 feedback thread at django-developers
list? ;)
I'm liking the pack of small improvements coming in this release, and
timing is very good, well done. I must say I'm less than happy with
the view classes though. Is the API on it frozen already?
On 11 nov, 05:34, Jam
12 matches
Mail list logo
