Bugger, the view approach won't work as the SQL query takes
parameters.
On Nov 14, 3:59 pm, Tomek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for that. You just gave me a good idea. I could simply replace
> that crazy SQL code with an equivalent view! This way I don't have to
> write any nasty code to de
Thanks for that. You just gave me a good idea. I could simply replace
that crazy SQL code with an equivalent view! This way I don't have to
write any nasty code to deal with old craziness.
In the last 10 minutes I have looked again at django_restapi code and
I have discovered an example for deali
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 02:36 +, Tomek wrote:
> Wow, what a quick reply! Thanks Malcolm.
>
> I'm pretty new to Django so excuse my inability to express myself in
> Django terms.
>
> I agree with your comments regarding taking the right approach to
> solving the problem (how very Pythonic of y
Wow, what a quick reply! Thanks Malcolm.
I'm pretty new to Django so excuse my inability to express myself in
Django terms.
I agree with your comments regarding taking the right approach to
solving the problem (how very Pythonic of you :-)
I tried django_restapi because it offered a quick starti
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 02:07 +, Tomek wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am using "django_restapi" (http://code.google.com/p/django-rest-
> interface/) to quickly gain access in a RESTful way to some tables in
> a legacy database. I am only really interested in reading the records
> and sending them back
5 matches
Mail list logo
