Re: Wondering about few 'burried' issues

2006-07-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If we have radio_admin for ForeignKeys (we do), then I can't see why we wouldn't want checkbox_admin for M2M. The danger with ether of these is that it becomes a very poor UI when there starts to be more than a handful of choices. But...if we've decided it's okay for one, it seems that it ought t

RE: Wondering about few 'burried' issues

2006-07-28 Thread Sebastian Forsman
go-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Malcolm Tredinnick Sent: 27. heinäkuuta 2006 18:39 To: django-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Wondering about few 'burried' issues On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 03:39 -0700, Sebastian F wrote: > I have been researchin

Re: Wondering about few 'burried' issues

2006-07-27 Thread Jay Klehr
Sebastian F wrote: > Another issue was with "BooleanFields". I noticed they always hit the > history even if not changed. Someone else had noticed this too and > already posted a ticket (http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1511). > Pretty easy to fix but has been open for 4 months? > > These are

Re: Wondering about few 'burried' issues

2006-07-27 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 03:39 -0700, Sebastian F wrote: > I have been researching few (web) application frameworks and > considering our projects, Django outperforms all of them easily, > reflecting exactly what we were going to build (well, no need to build > now). > > After playing around with so

Re: Wondering about few 'burried' issues

2006-07-27 Thread Simon Willison
On 27 Jul 2006, at 11:39, Sebastian F wrote: > But then it hit me, ticket was closed with > resolution 'wontfix' (http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2004). I am > curious, why? Your guess is as good as mine - it looks like the ticket was closed by the person who opened it. The Django core d