Because Django is so awesome, I'm glad to show off the little framework
built upon Django only 4 days of coding later (but after thinking about it
for years and being asked by a customer - coming from modern PHP frameworks
ecosystem - to implement such a thing in their project).
https://www.youtub
Hi all,
After taking a ride in Go lang framework world, and coming back with
the idea that I'd still be producing Django projects for the next 3
years, I have started to fix the problems I think are in Django in a
layer that sits on top of it: https://github.com/yourlabs/crudlfap
because I think t
Hi,
As far as I know, there is nothing that is compatible with Django and is
not Django? I don't really understand what you are trying to do either, and
why you don't want to use Django. From what you have written I am guessing
that you want the models/db layer and forms part from Django?
What I
Thank you my friend !
Best
Jamesie
<3
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send ema
.
--Matthew
-Original Message-
From: django-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:django-users@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jamesie Pic
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 9:03 AM
To: django-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Django forks
Hi all,
Those of you who use some of my apps know that I don&#
Hi all,
Those of you who use some of my apps know that I don't put inline
javascript code ever in fields, for the reason that it's known to slow
page rendering. Also, it isn't known to help maintainability nor
re-usability. That Django provides this as the only way does not
invalidates that.
Also
On Monday 17 April 2017 16:37:19 Matthew Pava wrote:
> Django 1.11 made a major change to widget rendering. I am wondering
> if this would help you significantly in your quest. The widget is
> rendered with a template. It would seem you could include the
> JavaScript in that template.
You can.
I'm really no expert in JS, but I have noticed that now that browsers are much
more compliant than they used to be a few years ago, there is a tendency by some
to avoid JS frameworks altogether and write vanilla JS. For example,
https://gomakethings.com/vanilla-js-guidebook/ (the author is an acqua
Thanks for the heads up Óscar, really cool app !
Upstream contribution is best yes, but not always possible in Django core.
For example in this case, we need to prove that an implementation is
working before contributing it upstream.
To prove that it works, we need to deploy it and live with it
The admin's fine of course, because it has javascript.
But then when using django-filter in django-rest-framework or anything
else that relies on django defaults then the party is over and the
fight for usability begins again.
I feel that in a majority of the cases, it's not for something I want,
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 18:07:07 (UTC+2), Jamesie Pic escribió:
>
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Vijay Khemlani > wrote:
> > If you need particular form widgets or fields not readily available in
> > Django I would prefer to write an app that includes them instead of
> forking
> > the wh
ango-users@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jamesie Pic
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2017 11:26 AM
To: django-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Django forks
Nice to meet you Matthew <3 That's really funny, because the reason I'm
currently in this is because I'm trying to honor a promise I made to th
Nice to meet you Matthew <3 That's really funny, because the reason
I'm currently in this is because I'm trying to honor a promise I made
to the community (and myself tbh ^^) when I abandoned v2 in favor of
v3.
v2 has really sound features, "just make an autocomplete for this
model by default", he
letes from v2 do
not render properly. I haven't had time to look into it, though.
-Original Message-
From: django-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:django-users@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jamesie Pic
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2017 11:06 AM
To: django-users@googlegroups.com
Subject:
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Vijay Khemlani wrote:
> If you need particular form widgets or fields not readily available in
> Django I would prefer to write an app that includes them instead of forking
> the whole framework.
That's why I've been writing AND maintaining apps such as
django-aut
Pic
> Sent: Monday, April 17, 2017 10:19 AM
> To: django-users@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: Django forks
>
> Matthew, using another framework for new projects would be a tempting
> solution, if I was not already maintaining god knows how many Django apps
> and projects, an
Jamesie Pic
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2017 10:19 AM
To: django-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Django forks
Matthew, using another framework for new projects would be a tempting solution,
if I was not already maintaining god knows how many Django apps and projects,
and basically had not been
Matthew, using another framework for new projects would be a tempting
solution, if I was not already maintaining god knows how many Django
apps and projects, and basically had not been capitalizing on Django
itself for the last decade.
Vijay, that RoR failed at it, fails to scare me out, and does
You can always make an extension. Many popular things in the framework are
contributions from the community including the current default authentication
system. It doesn't have to be in a fork either.On Apr 17, 2017 5:57 PM, Jamesie
Pic wrote:
>
> Dear Andréas,
>
> During the past decade, I ha
t; On Behalf Of Jamesie Pic
> Sent: Monday, April 17, 2017 9:58 AM
> To: django-users@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: Django forks
>
> Dear Andréas,
>
> During the past decade, I have fought that model fields do not have usable
> form fields out of the box.
>
> "D
@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Django forks
Dear Andréas,
During the past decade, I have fought that model fields do not have usable form
fields out of the box.
"Django doesn't want to couple a JS framework", is what I remember from
discussions. For me, having JS enabled form fields does not
Dear Andréas,
During the past decade, I have fought that model fields do not have
usable form fields out of the box.
"Django doesn't want to couple a JS framework", is what I remember
from discussions. For me, having JS enabled form fields does not mean
**removing** support for pure-HTML form fie
Hi,
Just out of curiosity, what is the problem that you are having?
Regards,
Andréas
2017-04-16 15:27 GMT+02:00 :
> Hello everybody !
>
> Anybody maintaining a Django fork and open for contributions ?
>
> I want to fix problems that have been recurrent for me over the last
> decade, and that D
23 matches
Mail list logo
