Jorge, muchas gracias!
I have not got as close as a mile from manipulators yet, even though
they look pretty cool. I'll certainly save your code around for later.
Who would have thought my code was not that off-track as I thought! =)
Anyway, a big thank you for the time you took to write this,
On 13-Jul-06, at 11:06 PM, Jorge Gajon wrote:
> But I'm totally wrong there. Your original code should be fine,
> because you were chaining the filters. The 'extends' is not necessary
> and in fact it is wrong.
you scared me a bit there ;-)
--
regards
kg
http://lawgon.livejournal.com
http://
Hi again Carlos,
I suggested this change in your code:
> results = Vozilo.objects.all()
> if selected_model_id != 0:
> results = results.filter(model_id__exact=selected_model_id)
> if selected_gorivo_id != 0:
> results.extend(results.filter(gorivo_id__exact=selected_go
Hi Carlos,
I think your code is going good so far. Of course I'm not a guru but I
think your code is fine. Is there something that you don't feel
comfortable with? With respect to adding the results of both filters,
you need to extend the results of the first results (if any), like
this:
res
On 13-Jul-06, at 8:02 PM, Carlos Yoder wrote:
> There must be a better way of doing this, right? I'm a terrible newbie
> both at Python and Django --and I'm not a kid anymore, so no more time
> to spare hitting my head on walls :-)
i have done more or less the same thing - yet to try it out tho
Hello people, my ongoing adventures in firstdjangoappland continue thus:
I'm putting together a simple search app for a car project. On entry,
user sees a list of 5 random cars. He can use up to two comboboxes to
filter the results (car model and fuel type).
This is what I've come up with on my
6 matches
Mail list logo
