On 11/17/06, Cam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any vague timeline until it merges with trunk?
>
> One of our oracle-centric dev teams is wavering on Django (and heading
> towards RoR) but could be persuaded to develop against the branch if a
> merge was likely this year.
I'd say a merge of the Ora
Exactly my position. I was even looking at TurboGears because they use
SQLAlchemy but then I see that it isn't totally integrated yet either.
Robert
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" g
Any vague timeline until it merges with trunk?
One of our oracle-centric dev teams is wavering on Django (and heading
towards RoR) but could be persuaded to develop against the branch if a
merge was likely this year.
cheers,
Cam
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You receiv
Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> On 11/15/06, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 11/15/06, Robert Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> In the databases section, Oracle is listed as supported. I have been on
>>> hiatus for bit. Has Oracle made it into Django .95 or is that entry in
On 11/15/06, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/15/06, Robert Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In the databases section, Oracle is listed as supported. I have been on
> > hiatus for bit. Has Oracle made it into Django .95 or is that entry in
> > anticipation of Django going 1.0 b
On 11/15/06, Robert Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the databases section, Oracle is listed as supported. I have been on
> hiatus for bit. Has Oracle made it into Django .95 or is that entry in
> anticipation of Django going 1.0 before the book is released?
There was a pretty productive spr
In the databases section, Oracle is listed as supported. I have been on
hiatus for bit. Has Oracle made it into Django .95 or is that entry in
anticipation of Django going 1.0 before the book is released?
Robert
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
7 matches
Mail list logo
